Message from @Deleted User d89d6dae
Discord ID: 375326951155695617
probably some kind of evaluation by men as measured at their ten year marriage mark or something
male subjective assessment of what good women they are after they've proven themselves in marriage seems reasonable enough
and it's not an autistic program of trying to militarize women, which is always retarded
GOOD AFTERNOON
the problem with it is that if you evaluate them after ten years of marriage, they've already had their kids, which defeats the purpose of deciding how much they should breed
probably allowing polygamy would fix it
because then if a woman was a shitty wife the man could just get a new wife and breed more with her
You can't allow polgyamy.
sure I can
I am a mormon, I believe in polygamy and space nazis
Monogamy and the nuclear family is the foundation of a stable society.
Polygamy is dysgenics.
the foundation of idiot christian society
polygamy is catholic bullshit
I JUST WANT A BIG BLACK COCK WITHOUT THE RISK OF AIDS
pagans and ancient aryans had polygamy, they did fine
The pagans got conquered.
so?
that doesn't mean the conquerers were superior people
OH WHERE'D ALL THIS PINOT GRIGIO GO NOW?
they could've been spiritually vacuous genetic garbage who were more vicious and coordinated
in fact that's pretty much my understanding of how that worked
catholic priests who looked like George Costanza invading aryan pagan lands, being extremely triggered by their statues of fit nordic people with little clothing, ordering them taken down
The Romans looked like George Costanza?
after the catholics expanded their empire to include north africa, yes
why am I modded
oh well lol
probably needed that moderation break anyway
I'm guessing you're pagan
no, mormon. I already said this
Why?
or, "yes, mormon," depending how you draw the line
10/10 LOVING HIM AGAIN
I WAS GREAT TO SEE YOU.
IF ONLY HE HAD SAID, "WE ARE GETTING RID OF DIVERSITY."
I WOULD HAVE BEEN THRILLED.
BABY STEPS, BABY STEPS.