Message from @Deleted User d89d6dae

Discord ID: 375326571361206273


2017-11-01 16:35:26 UTC  

I think with modern AI, you could easily take an RTS game and do standardized challenges in an ascending ladder of some sort to give a fairly objective rating of a person's ability

2017-11-01 16:41:20 UTC  

yeah, that sounds like a simple, objective, not overly restrictive program to screen for space marines

2017-11-01 16:41:36 UTC  

the question that remains is how to objectively screen for social/spiritual health

2017-11-01 16:42:38 UTC  

also I feel like the cognitive portion needs some kind of unstructured, semi structured or open ended building/engineering challenges

2017-11-01 16:42:46 UTC  

and mathematics, which is simple and easily standardized

2017-11-01 16:43:09 UTC  

if they can't finish calc 3, they cannot breed, the end

2017-11-01 16:43:17 UTC  

Are you talking to someone I can't see

2017-11-01 16:43:17 UTC  

make the math portion a simple screening

2017-11-01 16:43:32 UTC  

no, I have a migraine and all I can do is spew my thoughts, everything else hurts to do or even look at

2017-11-01 16:43:46 UTC  

so I'm just brainstorming ways to make top quality eugenics based on objective metrics

2017-11-01 16:49:08 UTC  

that seems like a good male quality stratification system

2017-11-01 16:49:20 UTC  

I wonder what a good female one would be

2017-11-01 16:50:16 UTC  

I have no interest in a woman's ability to do any of that stuff I just listed out

2017-11-01 16:51:36 UTC  

probably some kind of evaluation by men as measured at their ten year marriage mark or something

2017-11-01 16:52:03 UTC  

male subjective assessment of what good women they are after they've proven themselves in marriage seems reasonable enough

2017-11-01 16:52:22 UTC  

and it's not an autistic program of trying to militarize women, which is always retarded

2017-11-01 16:52:50 UTC  

GOOD AFTERNOON

2017-11-01 16:53:00 UTC  

the problem with it is that if you evaluate them after ten years of marriage, they've already had their kids, which defeats the purpose of deciding how much they should breed

2017-11-01 16:53:36 UTC  

probably allowing polygamy would fix it

2017-11-01 16:53:46 UTC  

because then if a woman was a shitty wife the man could just get a new wife and breed more with her

2017-11-01 16:53:47 UTC  

You can't allow polgyamy.

2017-11-01 16:53:51 UTC  

sure I can

2017-11-01 16:53:59 UTC  

I am a mormon, I believe in polygamy and space nazis

2017-11-01 16:54:00 UTC  

Monogamy and the nuclear family is the foundation of a stable society.

2017-11-01 16:54:06 UTC  

Polygamy is dysgenics.

2017-11-01 16:54:08 UTC  

the foundation of idiot christian society

2017-11-01 16:54:21 UTC  

polygamy is catholic bullshit

2017-11-01 16:54:27 UTC  

I JUST WANT A BIG BLACK COCK WITHOUT THE RISK OF AIDS

2017-11-01 16:54:41 UTC  

pagans and ancient aryans had polygamy, they did fine

2017-11-01 16:54:53 UTC  

The pagans got conquered.

2017-11-01 16:54:57 UTC  

so?

2017-11-01 16:55:03 UTC  

that doesn't mean the conquerers were superior people

2017-11-01 16:55:16 UTC  

OH WHERE'D ALL THIS PINOT GRIGIO GO NOW?

2017-11-01 16:55:18 UTC  

It proves they were stronger and more coordinated.

2017-11-01 16:55:30 UTC  

they could've been spiritually vacuous genetic garbage who were more vicious and coordinated

2017-11-01 16:55:50 UTC  

in fact that's pretty much my understanding of how that worked

2017-11-01 16:56:29 UTC  

catholic priests who looked like George Costanza invading aryan pagan lands, being extremely triggered by their statues of fit nordic people with little clothing, ordering them taken down

2017-11-01 16:57:26 UTC  

The Romans looked like George Costanza?

2017-11-01 16:58:32 UTC  

after the catholics expanded their empire to include north africa, yes

2017-11-01 16:59:11 UTC  

why am I modded

2017-11-01 16:59:14 UTC  

oh well lol