but whites largely are different enough from others racially to be "good enough" as homogenous

you can change your religion and sports team, I cannot change my race

I'm stuck with it

honestly based on white behavior I might've decided to become a jap years ago if it was an option, but I am stuck

When you say white people need to secure their share, what if a small group of white people gain a lot of wealth and influence while the majority do not? The group as a whole may still be benefited.

oh, the lefty "1%"->"institutionalized racism"/"white privilege" theory?

I'm not talking about wealth inequality generally here

I am a white millennial and I can confidently tell you that I am broke as fuck and white privilege has not helped me, the "1%" or what have you have passed laws that put me and everyone like me last in line for every job, school, scholarship, or other opportunity

I'm just asking what it means for a race to secure their share

land, institutions, companies, religions

looks like someone was reading sargon of wikipedia's talking points

What about them though?

they need to secure their share of anything of which a share can be secured

what race are you

But what does 'securing' mean? Some white people own some of them?

White

that's an abstract question

think about it

I'm not sure what definition of the term you're using here

THINK ABOUT IT

is there a country anywhere where I can go, by virtue of being racially white, where other people who are not racially white could not go, solely by virtue of being nonwhite? you know, like Israel and being Jewish. Does that exist?

No

are their companies that exclusively hire white people and laws that protect them in doing so?

No

are their "historically white colleges"?

No?

are there religions you can only join if you are white?

What is your point here

then anything that takes us from our current position of those not existing, and ends us at a position of those things existing, that is "securing" those things

don't overthink it bro

@Jossi am I wrong? am I off the mark?

So when you say there's not enough to go around, and white people need to secure their share, you mean this kind of segregation needs to be implemented?

are you stupid or something? did I stutter?

what part of "kick out all POC" was not clear

of course, racial separation is not *all* the altright seems to be about

no, i feel like this guy is either playing dumb or is just trolling

some of them are really on about capitalism and free markets, other guys are on about religious stuff (some christian, others pagan)

it's like asking "what is liberalism about"

It seems strange to talk about exclusively white businesses in a country that is exclusively white anyway. That's where I got confused, but now I think I get it.

america is a protestant country

But that comes back to the question, why do races need to be separated?