Message from @ZeroT
Discord ID: 553906692107141124
You should do that
You do not generate voltage
By pulling something up
I suggest you read the article I send you
Cavendish yeah sure, you should read the ACTUAL gravity literature
Okay guys have a nice day
Rose et al (1969) Rotating torsion balance with servo control of mass spacing
Pontikis (1972a) Resonant torsion pendulum with various attracting masses
Renner (1974) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Karagioz et al(1976) Evacuated torsion pendulum
Koldewyn (1976) Magnetically suspended torsion pendulum
Luther et al (1976) Rotating torsion balance
Mikkelsen and Newman (1977) geophysical and astronomical considerations
Yu et al (1978, 1979) Worden gravimeter
Sagitov et al (1979) Torsion pendulum with cylindrically shaped attracting and attracted masses
Page and Geilker (1981) Torsion pendulum with a measurement strategy governed by a quantum decision process
Karagioz et al (1981) Refinement of the results reported by Karagioz et al (1976)
Luther and Towler (1982) Torsion pendulum in time-of-swing mode
Oelfke (1984b) Torsion balance with small intermass spacing
Cohen and Taylor (1987) CODATA value for G from the 1986 adjustment of fundamental constants
Speake and Gillies (1987b) Evacuated beam balance with servo control
Liu et al (1987) Rotationally driven two-body interaction with suspended-coil sensing system
Goldblum (1987) Relative measurement of G using spin-polarized test masses
Karagioz et al (1987) Evacuated torsion balance with magnetic damper
de Boer et al (1987) Mercury-bearing-supported torsion balance with restoring torque supplied by quadrant electrometer
Dousse and Rheme (1987) Offset-mass torsion pendulum with servo-tracking
Moore et al (1988b) Evacuated beam balance
Saulnier and Frisch (1989) Ballistic motion of test masses on a torsion balance in accelerative field of depleted uranium
Muller et al (1990) Gravimetry at a pumped-storage hydroelectric reservoir
Zumberge et al (1991) Submarine-based geophysical measurement gravimetric profiles
Schurr et al (1991a, b, c) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator with external attracting mass
Yang et al (1991) Gravimetric measurement of a large cylindrical oil tank
Taylor et al (1992) PPK formalism and binary pulsar timing data
Schurr et al (1992a, b) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Oldham et al (1993) Gravimetry at a pumped-storage hydroelectric reservoir
Walesch et al (1994a, b) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Walesch et al (1995) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator
Fitzgerald and Armstrong (1995) Electrostatically nulled torsion balance
Hubler et al (1995) Electromagnetic balance used at a pumped storage reservoir
Meyer et al (1995) Fabry–Perot microwave resonator with external attracting mass
Fitzgerald (1995) Electrostatically nulled torsion balance
Michaelis et al (1995/96) Mercury-bearing-supported torsion balance with restoring torque
Bagley and Luther (1996) Torsion pendulum with Kuroda anelasticity correction
@ZeroT relax
Then explain to me why there are six orders of magnitude margin of error for G and senior physicists agree G probably isn't even a constant and the gravitational formula is missing variables
the 1995 one by FitzGerald even admitted coulomb forces fudged the results
I will go and study for my finals now
You guys just seem a bit ignorant for facts and you do not know how science works
Have a nice day guys 😄
Yes, maybe some education would have been good for you 😄
you would know how to analyze correctly
Because you really are the ones that repeat what others tell them
https://youtu.be/YMO0qvzDMqE
Let me know when you've worked out how this works
@Human Sheeple Yes, we know, everything on the internet has to be real ofc
science is a method that uses dependent and independent variables to confirm or falsify a hypothesis by demonstrating cause and effect observably testably repeatably, you can't show cause and effect of "gravity" can you?
I on the other hand can show cause and effect of charge and force
Like so
We can show effect and describe the cause very very good. as I said we cannot explain everything in science right now
Well have a nice day 😄
@ZeroT you ok
Look @Deleted User I do have wasted about 6 hours in VC explaining how the stuff works and everytime I was faced with ignorance and no scientific evidence
But as Isaid
I have better stuff to do
better stuff, really. Like what
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bV8hCkvT7gRFkoR6J0AY1mDwYfQR7PAg/view
Scientific evidence of apparenly mostly locally flat earth under certain weather conditions
https://www.oatext.com/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U-S-children.php Scientific evidence vaccines are doing more harm than good
@Deleted User Studiyng for my finals
@ZeroT yea, too bad what your studying is proberly exagerated lies too.
with all do respect, sir.