minus the nigger hate

wait so elaborate on your notion of google as something emerging in response to peoples' demand for a centralized source

elaborate on your notion of spread vs centralized

I mean, on the one hand you are right, if today's normal fucking retards were given full meshnet, google would take it over in 2 weeks

2 weeks into alpha testing, no less

but on the other hand, is there a reason tech like that, that is inherently difficult to censor, couldn't help something?

I mean I always envision a worst case outcome of it, like google takes it all over and installs protocols on every device to block everyone they dislike

and all the devices triangulate the location of the machines relaying crimethought

"By using Google and its affiliates you agree to our Terms of Service*"

then everyone hits "agree" and it says "you agree to let us silently install a package blocking an ever updated list of people we don't like from your relay"

I mean that's an obvious evolution, decentralized so people compete by trying to re-establish exclusivity

THE PROBLEM IS

IN MY VIEW

THAT PEOPLE NEED SOMETHING TO IMITATE AND FOLLOW

SO GIVEN A DECENTRALIZED NET

YOU HAVE A BUNCH OF NORMIES YELLING AT EACH OTHER

"WELL THIS SOURCE SAYS"

SO THEY START TO THINK, "WE NEED A DEFINITIVE SOURCE"

MAINLY BECAUSE THEY NEED TO BE TOLD WHAT TO THINK

THEY CANNOT TRUST ARGUMENT ITSELF TO REVEAL WHAT IS CLEAR

SO THEY WOULD INVENT WIKIPEDIA AGAIN

of course

the question is not whether the herd gonna herd, it's what option leads to a better fate for all 5 of us left who prefer to draw our own conclusions

so in my view it would be strategically valuable to push the mass adoption of a tech that allowed the smartest to have some wiggle room regardless of the outcome for the 98%

convince altright they need to oppose it because it's egalitarian, convince liberals they must do it because it expands access to the poor, is more eco friendly, yadda yadda

make any sense?

MAKES PERFECT SENSE, BUT THERE IS MORE WE MUST CONSIDER

WE CANNOT RUN AWAY AND HAVE OUR OWN SPACE

IT WILL BE OVERWHELMED OR, WORSE, MARGINALIZE ALL INTELLIGENT DISCUSSION

THEN 98% OF THE DISCUSSION WILL BE INANE STUFF AND THAT WILL THEN TAKE OVER

WHICH MEANS THAT ANYTHING WE WANT TO DISCUSS WILL BE TABOO

SO THERE ARE ONLY TWO OPTIONS:

1. A HIERARCHY WHERE THE BEST DOMINATE THE REST

2. A MOB RULE WHERE THE REST DOMINATE THE BEST

UNDER GOOGLE WE HAVE #2

EARLY INTERNET WAS #1 BECAUSE IT WAS EXCLUSIVE AND THUS NATURALLY HIERARCHICAL

WHEN EVERYONE IS ACADEMIC, MILITARY, OR HIGH END RESEARCH, CONVERSATIONS GO A LOT SMOOTHER

wait wait wait

"we cannot just have our own space"

is that true?

look at my chat in detail