Message from @Exilarch
Discord ID: 423706412829507584
GOOGLE CAME ABOUT FOR A REASON
THE CATHEDRAL IS CAREERISM
What are you talking about ?
Wikipedia isn't media. It's a crowd sourced encyclopaedias.
Rational wiki is the overtly liberally biased one.
in my view they are both overtly liberally biased
just to different levels of obnoxious blatancy
WIKIPEDIA IS HEAVILY BIASED
RATIONALWIKI IS STRAIGHT UP UNCONCEALED PROPGANDA
rationalwiki is r/fullcommunism, wikipedia is the news anchor going "well OBVIOUSLY we all want a society that's EQUAL!"
GOOD ANALOGY
WIKIPEDIA IS MAINSTREAM LEFTISM
RATIONALWIKI IS CHE GUEVARA LITE
minus the nigger hate
wait so elaborate on your notion of google as something emerging in response to peoples' demand for a centralized source
elaborate on your notion of spread vs centralized
I mean, on the one hand you are right, if today's normal fucking retards were given full meshnet, google would take it over in 2 weeks
2 weeks into alpha testing, no less
but on the other hand, is there a reason tech like that, that is inherently difficult to censor, couldn't help something?
I mean I always envision a worst case outcome of it, like google takes it all over and installs protocols on every device to block everyone they dislike
"By using Google and its affiliates you agree to our Terms of Service*"
then everyone hits "agree" and it says "you agree to let us silently install a package blocking an ever updated list of people we don't like from your relay"
I mean that's an obvious evolution, decentralized so people compete by trying to re-establish exclusivity
THE PROBLEM IS
IN MY VIEW
THAT PEOPLE NEED SOMETHING TO IMITATE AND FOLLOW
SO GIVEN A DECENTRALIZED NET
YOU HAVE A BUNCH OF NORMIES YELLING AT EACH OTHER
"WELL THIS SOURCE SAYS"
SO THEY START TO THINK, "WE NEED A DEFINITIVE SOURCE"
MAINLY BECAUSE THEY NEED TO BE TOLD WHAT TO THINK
THEY CANNOT TRUST ARGUMENT ITSELF TO REVEAL WHAT IS CLEAR
SO THEY WOULD INVENT WIKIPEDIA AGAIN
of course
the question is not whether the herd gonna herd, it's what option leads to a better fate for all 5 of us left who prefer to draw our own conclusions
so in my view it would be strategically valuable to push the mass adoption of a tech that allowed the smartest to have some wiggle room regardless of the outcome for the 98%
convince altright they need to oppose it because it's egalitarian, convince liberals they must do it because it expands access to the poor, is more eco friendly, yadda yadda
make any sense?
MAKES PERFECT SENSE, BUT THERE IS MORE WE MUST CONSIDER
WE CANNOT RUN AWAY AND HAVE OUR OWN SPACE