Message from Fenix704 in Realism #general


2018-04-02 15:06:42 UTC  

But you're looking at only what they verbalize.

2018-04-02 15:06:49 UTC  

Look at what they do.

2018-04-02 15:06:53 UTC  

Say; education.

2018-04-02 15:06:59 UTC  

Public education.

2018-04-02 15:07:35 UTC  

Hey, what's going on?

2018-04-02 15:07:41 UTC  

A closer approximation to equality of outcome is achieved by forcing the superior students in with the inferior, then teaching to the lower.

2018-04-02 15:07:58 UTC  

So the higher ones become embittered, bored, and "problem kids".

2018-04-02 15:09:29 UTC  

They say that destroying hierarchy means anyone who was previously lower is able to rise to the areas formerly denied to them, but it means that those formerly higher are never allowed to be there again.

2018-04-02 15:09:34 UTC  

Everyone is cut off from it.

2018-04-02 15:09:44 UTC  

I can see your point

2018-04-02 15:09:59 UTC  

Reminds me of a video they showed us in class

2018-04-02 15:10:53 UTC  

@Horns ok thanks

2018-04-02 15:11:05 UTC  

Eventually, you end up with CONSERVATIVE TRADITIONALISTS supporting the leering vaishya thinking they're smart.

2018-04-02 15:11:10 UTC  

There was this NGO saying "If we took money from the rich and gave it to the poor we'd all have food and water" and stuff, but what about the rich? Fuck them, right?

2018-04-02 15:11:24 UTC  

Stupid Marxist teachers.

2018-04-02 15:11:43 UTC  

That is what happened in the bolshevik revolution.

2018-04-02 15:12:06 UTC  

2/3 of their wealth should be siezed since they are no longer concerned with investing that into the production of non financial goods and services.

2018-04-02 15:12:08 UTC  

Looting churches was part of the state's revenue.

2018-04-02 15:12:10 UTC  

Just saying

2018-04-02 15:12:27 UTC  

Not seized by the proletariat though.

2018-04-02 15:13:05 UTC  

People should keep their well-earned stuff, because it's theirs and everyone should keep what they deserve to have.

2018-04-02 15:13:18 UTC  

Yeah, the problem with leftist approaches is defining the "we".

2018-04-02 15:13:22 UTC  

So that's why I'm against socialism.

2018-04-02 15:13:27 UTC  

"We" is those who want to be "us".

2018-04-02 15:13:33 UTC  

If you don't you are "them".

2018-04-02 15:13:39 UTC  

The vicious reactionaries.

2018-04-02 15:13:52 UTC  

Against the tide of progress.

2018-04-02 15:14:22 UTC  

inb4 vigilance says that's the alt right problem

2018-04-02 15:14:35 UTC  

Cuts both ways

2018-04-02 15:14:48 UTC  

It doesn't.

2018-04-02 15:15:02 UTC  

Alt right "us" doesn't aim at universality.

2018-04-02 15:15:26 UTC  

SOCIALISM IS JUST AN ECONOMIC INTERPRETATION OF EGALITARIANISM

2018-04-02 15:15:28 UTC  

`we would be colonizing Jupiter by now if it wasn't for welfare` is a chromatic variation of the progress motif.

2018-04-02 15:15:53 UTC  

PEOPLE DON'T DESERVE SHIT FOR BEING THERE

2018-04-02 15:15:57 UTC  

EARN IT

2018-04-02 15:16:30 UTC  

what does that have to do with defining us vs. them around the problem of universality?

2018-04-02 15:16:55 UTC  

Alt-right doesn't presume prior equality.

2018-04-02 15:16:57 UTC  

BEING POOR IN AFRICA DOESN'T ENTITLE YOU TO MIGRATE ILLEGALLY

2018-04-02 15:17:13 UTC  

notice me senpai

2018-04-02 15:17:20 UTC  

SERIOUSLY, IF PEOPLE IN EUROPE UNDERSTOOD

2018-04-02 15:17:33 UTC  

REFUGEES DON'T DESERVE SHIT