You have data that is present before your experiment

@.PunishedShlomo THAT is corect

Why is this an issue?

if it has no input from relity

You make a hypotesis based on the data you have and what you want to test on

yeah wtff

Blacks did better under the strict thumb of Whites. Why because through external stimuli they were forced to act like us. As soon as that external stimuli was removed they reverted back to nature

is the question that you need to be aware of a subject to question it?

@Tenet

or like have knowledge of it in the first place

how is observation/data/research invalid in a fucking chance universe??? lol its more meaningful in such a scenario if anything

PREQUESENT

not a word

good job

Although I think the above is a good way to show how a lot of science works now.

😂

EM K!!!!

one does not

lol its abstract because it's not in the christian worldview

What's his argument

abstract bridge

hahah

Darth Dawkins scientific method.

CHRISTIANITY = TRUE > Say that you can't prove it isn't > Submit new found Theory as proof of how tight he is.

But wait? What is your evidence?

Dah biblez tells me it's twue.

dandramere what is your highest level of education?

How does a hypothesis formed in a vacuum have no meaning whatsoever?

it is based on nothing

It is based on something

Double digit IQ

Alert

no

if it was formed in a vacumm it is based on nothing