Message from @Mumberthrax
Discord ID: 366665698178498560
He says he has power to influence people
Dripping Water Symbolism: (#17112015) Loss of emotion or Power
A item that is rotting is losing its power to support itself
#1912015 The paper says hate, he burns the paper in the video, he is burning away hate
Wait paddock had a YouTube account?
Yeah
Mr. Paper
He definitely had mental health issues, that much we know is true at least.
>not making millions anymore
"Hurr durr i lik amerikkka now."
"Jus gimme muh moneys bruh."
Thats basically what hes saying
"i really dont represent those ideas i was kneeling for"
"i'll stand for the anthem if you give me my money back"
"im sorry for being such a piece of shit pls give me my job back"
>get rekt liberal nigger faggot
So I've been idling, has the california HIV madness already been talked about to death here?
I honestly can't wrap my head around the logic of reducing the criminality of willfully infecting people without warning
they say that it is to encourage people to get tested, because people apparently would rather not know if they're infected with a life-threatening disease than risk dealing with the consequences of... infecting people?
like, if i put myself in the position of someone who has lots of risky sex, and I think "hey I might have HIV" I would want to get tested so that i can take precautions against getting AIDS and dying.
the only risk I face is 1) stigma of having HIV 2) felony charges for infecting people without telling them after i have been tested
stigma is far outweighed by death from the disease imo, so its literally got to be the sort of person who *would* willfully withhold their condition to sex partners that are being protected here...
so they aren't targeting innocent people with this at all, for one thing. it's got to be purely a strategy to convince immoral scum to get tested.... which i guess makes some sense in a way
still doesn't seem quite right
at the very least i hope people who infect others without being tested themselves are charged with gross willful negligence
still though, if someone is HIV+, they've been tested already, and they're immoral scum... the incentive not to infect people has just been slashed dramatically
Fuck Kapernaxk
Not even a good player
I think he’s a low Info voter
im wondering
how many people get penalized by that CA law every year
probs a majority
jk
maybe like at most 15% at least 3%
California needs some serious fucking help
I honestly am fine with gay people, but pushing that law frankly disgusts me
what really gets me is that they seem to be passing it off as a reform to a law from bygone days of prejudice against gay people... and its like, that only makes sense if you're claiming that people who are grossly negligent and go around infecting people are somehow representative of all gay people
which obviously they wouldn't want to suggest outwardly
so i guess the question becomes was this a change in law written knowing that it will cause more problems, or was it penned by true believer progressives who didn't really think about the details for fear of being bigoted
i would tend to expect the majority voting were the latter, but who knows
DISCUSSION TIME: **How has Donald Trump been doing as President?**
Trump has been winning and basically any argument otherwise is invalid.
Could be better, could be worse, IMO. Acceptable in my book.