>thinks that 6% of someones gonad is statistically irrelevant
>also thinks one person out of 8 Billion is statistically relevant

Heat beat as I said earlier, there is a lot of nunance to take into account.

THERE ARE 2 GENDERS, AND 2 SCOOPS, FOR 2 PRESIDENTIAL DJT TENURES

someone just throw in the towel

.6%

@Dolly Let us talk about greater things, such as <:dindu:356316970733404161> 🍆

@TUNDRA You are really bad at this

Lol

lets count to how many genders there are. ill start

1

So let's get onto more important things, like the NFL getting BTFO. Or Hollyweird imploding. THIS IS THE BEST TIMELINE

2

BUILD THAT WALL!

3

B-but guys this one lady who became a man due to a genetic mutation means gender isn’t a genetic thing (even though genetics from her parents caused the mutation) and since brains are sexed organs THERE FOREEEEE REEE SOCIAL CONSTRUCT

4

5

Ninja you literally just deny flat out science that doesn't support your conclusions.

i declare a thimb war

6

"must be fake liberal science hurdur"

WE LIVE IN THE GREATEST COUNTRY ON EARTH

B-but guys this one lady who became a man due to a genetic mutation means gender isn’t a genetic thing (even though genetics from her parents caused the mutation) and since brains are sexed organs THERE FOREEEEE REEE SOCIAL CONSTRUCT

USA! USA! USA!

REE

🇺🇸

USA 🇺🇸

🇺🇸

For good reason, leftists... alright I mean there is a book based on it

Most social ‘science’ is inherently biased and not peer-reviewed

Look it up

USA USA USA USA

🇺🇸

But cited by the left out of context anyways.

This isn't social science it's medical science

Or you wont because living under a rock is good for you

It's an endocrinology journal...

social science is bullshit as a whole

@TUNDRA and we literally showed that she was a genetic defect

Omg you are dense

Uh-uh >medical science LEL the one article you linked contradicts your own point