Borders is the best answer

with a semblance of peace agreement

Kind of everything @Fliqks

Keeping countries seperate does make sense

judging by the EU and liberals (who are the majority) it seems borders *aren't* wanted

But it’s no easy task

all the rich go get certain citizenships to ensure they can go everywhere whenever

seems people don't like borders

but govs do ofc

A macro environment of this is you going to work. You probably don't like everyone you work with correct? But at the end of the day, you can go home, a place that's yours and the way you like it.

no borders = no monopolistic control over people living in a region

People want freedom

People want freedom

@TheNikitis I'm in support of eliminating private homes

and instead switching to a more efficient temporary room system

And they need a place to exercise that freedom

similar to a hotel, but free and smaller

Might be a good idea for some

I prefer land and home ownership

to raise cattle

in general I'm against ownership. Raising cattle is a large red flag as well

I'm not a city person

the earth is flat

sounds like you want something that isn't sustainable

How?

Giving people free things encourages them to do less

I can sell my cattle and provide much needed protien to those in the city who have none

free roaming cows, enough to eat how most people eat now, we wouldn't have enough land for enough cows to feed everyone

We can live symbiotically

large property, while it can be a thing, largely means living rurally

@WeebHunter69 mum

You can make your cows have sex. Lots of it

which is unsustainable for large societal systems

make enough cows

Yeah?

cows

>>unmute 420815308148703273

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully unmuted **DeepStatePedoHunter**#7681

@TheNikitis then they can't be free roaming and grass fed

you'd have to factory farm

which is what we do