@realFlatEarther why do we bring oxygen up there lol

sheeple i have a question regarding how your beliefs have affected your career

has your beliefs caused opportunities to close or make your life harder in general?

@Human Sheeple

Okay.

@aydenwithay WHOLE SALE DODGE right there, HOW CAN YOU HAVE GAS NEXT TO NO GAS WITHOUT A CONTAINER

Thanks, I guess?

@Human Sheeple it goes gradually i think

Notice the transformation is gradual.

👀

So, It makes sense!

It because of the G word

The word I’m not allowed to say

Or I’ll get banned

@Human Sheeple What you are referring to is one exact gas next to a vacuum, (Which the Atmosphere is not), Until then, Similar to the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics, Will reach Equilibrium, Which still keeps some atmosphere. The Earth's Atmosphere, However, Is not like that. The Pressure, Gas molecules, Weather, And even some atoms gradually decrease as you reach the vacuum of space.

@Noodles You gave the classic BWGARRRK 🐦 PRESSURE GRADIENTS response.

Let me make this really simple for your bird brain ok?

Which comes first

1. GAS PRESSURE

or

2. GAS PRESSURE GRADIENTS


You cannot have DELTA X before you have X

In other words, Crayon Muncher you can't have 2 before you have 1! Can you?

Are you saying that.. There's an equal amount of Gas in the atmosphere..?

Dude, You said it yourself. It can't happen.

So It's gradual.

charles law?

You just disproved your own statement!

So don't.

But yes, I can see where you're coming from.

I just.. Didn't appreciate you calling me a bird brain?

@Noodles THE RAPID MOTION AND COLLISIONS OF MOLECULES WITH THE WALLS OF THE CONTAINER "CAUSES" GAS PRESSURE!

Note the word CONTAINER = v https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume

Where is the CONTAINER in your spinning water pear space monkey fairy tale religion?

So again, how can you have GAS PRESSURE GRADIENTS before you have GAS PRESSURE without a CONTAINER?

You need to have X before you can have DELTA X

I’m so confused

If you want, I can explain the third law of thermodynamics one more time to you.

Key word,

'Equillibrium'.

Because for some reason you don't believe in the atmosphere, Yet you believe in thermodynamics?

the earth is flat because when you pour water on the ground it doesn’t roll off

@Noodles Show me the atmo--AIR is SPHERICAL please

Okay, I'll post it for you, One more time.

01-page 12:
“aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

02-page 108:
“aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf

03-page 126:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf

04-page 2:
“The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed. ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

05-page 11:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

06-page 32:
“Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf

07-page 2:
“In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf

If there was an atom (or several atoms) of gas layer then it would be sucked into the voice, Correct.

08-page 14:
“The earth is flat and non-rotating.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

09-page 25:
“The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with rerpect to
a flat, nonrotating Earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf

10-page 13:
“A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf

11-page 19:
“These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth.”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf

12-page 9:
“For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together
represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014378.pdf

13-page 14:
“A flat, nonrotating earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf

14-page 2:
“In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf

15-page 8:
“the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf