Message from @Explain_It_Kakyion

Discord ID: 555937657130319892


2019-03-15 02:14:47 UTC  

You need to have X before you can have DELTA X

2019-03-15 02:14:49 UTC  

I’m so confused

2019-03-15 02:14:54 UTC  

If you want, I can explain the third law of thermodynamics one more time to you.

2019-03-15 02:14:57 UTC  

Key word,

2019-03-15 02:15:00 UTC  

'Equillibrium'.

2019-03-15 02:15:18 UTC  

Because for some reason you don't believe in the atmosphere, Yet you believe in thermodynamics?

2019-03-15 02:15:24 UTC  

the earth is flat because when you pour water on the ground it doesn’t roll off

2019-03-15 02:15:49 UTC  

@Noodles Show me the atmo--AIR is SPHERICAL please

2019-03-15 02:16:03 UTC  

Okay, I'll post it for you, One more time.

2019-03-15 02:16:17 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555937286215434250/main-qimg-7b1e1d8b13e8ffac51f83dc460accb81.png

2019-03-15 02:16:38 UTC  

01-page 12:
“aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88072main_H-1259.pdf

02-page 108:
“aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf

03-page 126:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations sith stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth assumptions.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890007066.pdf

04-page 2:
“The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth may be assumed. ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

05-page 11:
“The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat nonrotating earth”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88248main_H-1777.pdf

06-page 32:
“Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940020279.pdf

07-page 2:
“In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth ”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20070030307.pdf

2019-03-15 02:16:42 UTC  

If there was an atom (or several atoms) of gas layer then it would be sucked into the voice, Correct.

2019-03-15 02:16:46 UTC  

08-page 14:
“The earth is flat and non-rotating.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19790005472.pdf

09-page 25:
“The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with rerpect to
a flat, nonrotating Earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19810003557.pdf

10-page 13:
“A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19650015408.pdf

11-page 19:
“These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth.”
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/pdf/88733main_H-2465.pdf

12-page 9:
“For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together
represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19880014378.pdf

13-page 14:
“A flat, nonrotating earth”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19710018599.pdf

14-page 2:
“In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20060053337.pdf

15-page 8:
“the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating earth.”
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/…/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040008097.pdf

2019-03-15 02:16:57 UTC  

What did you even just post..? Isn't that spam?

2019-03-15 02:17:13 UTC  

I don't know what these links contribute to the current conversation, But okay!

2019-03-15 02:17:14 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555937523130695681/560827_689889131032101_1368979279_n1.jpg

2019-03-15 02:17:16 UTC  

Why air AIR craft, or ATMO craft flying on a FLAT NON ROTATING EARTH when you just asserting ATMO-or AIR SPHERE

2019-03-15 02:17:21 UTC  
2019-03-15 02:17:24 UTC  

Don’t doubt Sheeple

2019-03-15 02:17:39 UTC  

Can you say that properly so I know what you just said?

2019-03-15 02:17:46 UTC  

Press (x) to doubt

2019-03-15 02:17:52 UTC  

Elon Musk is the best billionaire genius ever

2019-03-15 02:18:09 UTC  

OK let me explain this reallllly simply, breathe in, notice the air, breathe out. that is gas PRESSURE

2019-03-15 02:18:14 UTC  

Aerodynamics still apply even where there is atmospheric pressure.

2019-03-15 02:18:16 UTC  
2019-03-15 02:18:16 UTC  

Yeah?

2019-03-15 02:18:19 UTC  

Stupid the earth is flat

2019-03-15 02:18:42 UTC  

in your spinning monkey ball pseudoscience religion you BELIEVE above the karman line is space that is a vacuum of approximately 10^-17 torr

2019-03-15 02:18:55 UTC  

How does this pressure exist next to a vacuum without a CONTAINER ?

2019-03-15 02:19:16 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555938033338155021/No_cure_for_stupid_meme.png

2019-03-15 02:19:43 UTC  

@wobblyboost u try and make a system that google would buy off u for billions

2019-03-15 02:20:17 UTC  

The earth is flat, change my mind

2019-03-15 02:20:31 UTC  

Im entirely unintrested in assisting google or having a million dollars. Thanks.

2019-03-15 02:20:41 UTC  

Lol

2019-03-15 02:20:51 UTC  

I would like a million dollars

2019-03-15 02:20:58 UTC  

Elon Musk is a great person

2019-03-15 02:21:01 UTC  

Cool, Try this experiment for yourself. Take a vacuum chamber, (Which I doubt you even have), Then take a hypothetical cup of various gases. Now pretend there's such thing as 'Gravity', (To you), Then notice how the gases slowly but gradually fill out because the atmosphere **isn't 5 feet in length, It's ginormous.**

2019-03-15 02:21:12 UTC  

He was in meme review

2019-03-15 02:21:19 UTC  

I notice you keep repeating the same statement about requiring a container but saying It's gradual really does prove a point, Does it not?

2019-03-15 02:21:55 UTC  

Do you have anything else to say besides 'containers'?