Message from @aydenwithay
Discord ID: 555948052284702730
@Noodles Yes I'm still waiting for your Scientific method experiment that shows
```HOW DO YOU HAVE GAS PRESSURE NEXT TO A VACUUM WITHOUT A CONTAINER```
and
```HOW DOES MASS INCREASE THE RATE OF ACCELERATION OF OTHER BODIES WITH MASS```
Let me know when you have some actual EVIDENCE.
Okay. My question is, 'Is Gravity Real?'. I determine this Screwdriver has mass. I pick it up. I let go. It falls down, (Which is what Gravity is and does. It accelerates objects with mass towards the center). Huh?
Did that fall down?
BUSTED
Helium is lighter than air.
But, Okay.
WRONG
It's less DENSE than air
Yeah.
lighter === LESS MASS
Density === LESS MASS/VOLUME
density = mass/volume
I can manipulate the rate of accleration by manipulating DENSITY
You however CANNOT manipulate the rate of acceleration by manipulating MASS
Can you @Noodles ?
Fucking knucklehead, go back and read the scientific method.
do you seriously say this stuff as a professor?
So, Again, To kill 2 birds with 1 stone, Buoyancy. Buoyancy is an upward force, And everything requires equilibrium. (Think, A denser liquid than water sinks to the bottom, Less dense goes to the top). Mass does does not have affect on acceleration due to **gravity.**
It's like when a lighter object accelerates slower than heavy objects.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes%27_principle
No gravity here, is there? 🤔
So again show me scientific method experimental evidence that:
DELTA MASS
is
DELTA ACCELERATION
So.. Since the manipulation of Mass doesn't affect Acceleration, You *also* somehow believe in Gravity to an extent or do you not know what you're talking about?
@Human Sheeple it doesnt
Don't you think that's why helium **floats?**
Helium FLOATS because it is LESS DENSE than air
Also, Buoyancy has a correlation to Gravity, Correct?
Not in Archimedes Principle no
The Archimedes Principle is *about* buoyancy. Buoyancy has correlation with Gravity.
So, More Cherry-Picking?
WRONG archimedes principle dates back to ancient Greece, about 2000 years before Newton started saying "IF EARTH IS A BALL" ---> GRAVITY
You realize Science changes, Right?
Science is a METHOD
The same way we knew about Stars but we didn't know everything about them.
Cause and Efffect DOES NOT CHANGE
That doesn't mean they know the complete picture to *everything* about buoyancy.
It's not just a formula.
So why did Archimedes Principle work then WITHOUT ANY MENTION OF GRAVITY?
It's much, Much more.
Why do you think the objects falls on the water in the first place?
It worked then when it had *holes.*
Because they are less DENSE than air or less DENSE than water respectively