Message from @Kfish
Discord ID: 502747502509031454
For example.
@YMHUK42 That would be meritocracy though. Pure egalitarianism throughout is anti-science
Obviously the USSR wasnt gonna accept downies that try to become scientists
@Kfish Communism does not declare that people are biologically equal.
But they should be socially equal.
Have equal opportunities.
so farmers should be paid the same amount as sscientists?
After the revolution we shall turn Christmas socalist an make Marx santa ..he shall be santa marx
@Kfish No. But the difference shouldn't be like "Scientists can buy anything and farmers are starve".
yeah that makes sense
I dont see why we even disagree otherwise
In some socialist models physical laborers earn more than office workers to offset risk and physical stress, so they can work less
@👻S🅱ooccy👻 It's because such work ruins health.
Well yea, but also office work is typically less demanding and enjoyed more too
Like miners or steel-factory workers.
@Kfish It's actually interesting that the most open-minded right-wingers I have met were libertarians.
pretty sure moving left wasnt inevitable, moving towards non-ideologycucked systems was what happened
thats why most superpowers are authoritarian or centrist
if you arent restricted by your ideals
Anarchists couldn't manage a superpower tbh
anyone doing anything would go against their ideology
At least not in popular examples of anarchy there's no pragmatism
Most societies move towards populism or leftism naturally tho as a result of worker and citizens struggle historically, this is also the stage most empires collapse because the elite want to retain power
not particularly a bad thing
just wish they could get the saudis first
