It's ok. I am, as well.

I was asking why charges act which the force is inversely proportional to its radius and magnets. (This is proved on earth) But gravity which works the same way is not real?

we all are at some point @🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄

@мιяαgє that was my question

for explanation

like...I actually dont mean too offend or anything at all

just looking for a peaceful debate

at which at the end I don't expect anyone to change their minds

just talk about the subject

i see it now space tin foil rockets are moon worthy thanks

i now see all the stars

and 4 inch space gaps is real nasa

are you talking to me?

or #3

all of you

oh

you have convinced me that tin foil rockets arent retarded engineering

its 100% real

i wa sa fool

ye my word is kinda confusing

so u know how my pocture had the equation

picture*

which showed force is inversly proportional to radius?

eg, charges have a force at which the closer a charge is, the more force on it

and magnets do the same thing

but when gravity is said to work the same way

its auto fake

222222222222222222222222

so I'm just asking

anyone guys?

like im srsly just tryna have a debate

not tryna shitpost

What type of charges are you talking about? That term can be attributed to a very many things. @ibyghee

electric charges

like in electron or protons

22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222

charge is just current x time