and you wont do that through democracy

uc regents v bakke ruled no numerical quotas

since both parties are loaded with traitors working for foreign interests

and for plutocrats

with motives which are contradictory in many cases to the greater good

I don't see it, the rich aren't the only ones in this country with influence on elected officials

they're still accountable to their voters

you have a very naive view of the world

The rich sway voter interest though

but you're only 17

The rich control the voters in the USA

The media controls the minds of the people. The rich have large interest in media corporations.

Since they control the media and how they perceive the elected officials as

The problem is white elites have no racial cohesion.

Imagine if the rockefeller family weren't anti white faggots.

Could get much of the US infrastructure to support demographic cohesion.

media has always been biased and controlled by either the wealthy or by political parties themselves

that's not really anything new

if anything it's become more democratic in recent years through online media

>freedom of association already exists

really?

I am allowed to ban black people from dining at my restaurant?

^

it's more for hiring practice though

@agag you're telling me that I can choose not to serve black people and the government will not come shut down my business, take my money or imprison me for doing so?

This is false.

because last I checked they do that

so freedom of association does not exist

@NormieCamo no, Congress has the exclusive right to regulate commerce and anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act fall under that

if congress regulates who I can associate with, I do not have freedom of association

when alabama tried to make the NAACP turn over membership lists the SCOTUS ruled that they didn't have to do that

"Immunity from state scrutiny of petitioner's membership lists is here so related to the right of petitioner's members to pursue their lawful private interests privately and to associate freely with others in doing so as to come within the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment"

congress has the right to regulate private businesses

yes it does, but that means by definition that it is not free association

lt has to do with what's called inter-state commerce @NormieCamo

you don't believe in free association if you support the 14th

Literally everything is inter-state commerce, and if it is inter-state commerce, it is regulated at the federal level.

this isn't the 14th amendment

when Congress tried to pass the Civil RIghts Act in the 19th century under the 14th it was overturned

There was one case where a guy didn't want blacks in his grocery store and the winning argument was that, since the products in the store are frmo out of state, it is inter-state commerce and therefore must be regulated by the Feds

right my bad, I mean the civil rights act