no matter the race

private employers are allowed to do whatever they want with regards to diversity quotas

numerical quotas

but government institutions aren't allowed to do that

diversity in govt institutions is good

the weaker they are the better

maybe but I actually want this country to succeed and have good government

in this case the govt institution was public universities

that wont happen until you get traitors out of govt

and you wont do that through democracy

uc regents v bakke ruled no numerical quotas

since both parties are loaded with traitors working for foreign interests

and for plutocrats

with motives which are contradictory in many cases to the greater good

I don't see it, the rich aren't the only ones in this country with influence on elected officials

they're still accountable to their voters

you have a very naive view of the world

The rich sway voter interest though

but you're only 17

The rich control the voters in the USA

The media controls the minds of the people. The rich have large interest in media corporations.

Since they control the media and how they perceive the elected officials as

The problem is white elites have no racial cohesion.

Imagine if the rockefeller family weren't anti white faggots.

Could get much of the US infrastructure to support demographic cohesion.

media has always been biased and controlled by either the wealthy or by political parties themselves

that's not really anything new

if anything it's become more democratic in recent years through online media

>freedom of association already exists

really?

I am allowed to ban black people from dining at my restaurant?

^

it's more for hiring practice though

@agag you're telling me that I can choose not to serve black people and the government will not come shut down my business, take my money or imprison me for doing so?

This is false.

because last I checked they do that

so freedom of association does not exist

@NormieCamo no, Congress has the exclusive right to regulate commerce and anti-discrimination laws like the Civil Rights Act fall under that

if congress regulates who I can associate with, I do not have freedom of association

when alabama tried to make the NAACP turn over membership lists the SCOTUS ruled that they didn't have to do that

"Immunity from state scrutiny of petitioner's membership lists is here so related to the right of petitioner's members to pursue their lawful private interests privately and to associate freely with others in doing so as to come within the protection of the Fourteenth Amendment"