Even more than that

Or less, really.

@Fsypro Yes I think so as well

He's not talking about literal hunger but He's not talking about devotional worship either

Christ IS the bread

Hello TRS

Hello

Christ IS the wine

Just a reminder

Why am I like this?

@/pol/tard wdym?

to be a good goy and abide by Discord's ToS

<:BluePill:356316934444285974>

look at the Crucifixion scene

@agag Yes, but low IQ people turned this into some weird ritual about eating bread and drinking wine. Once again missing the point. To eat the bread of life to drink the "blood of Christ" is to align one's mind to his consciousness.

water and blood are what spills out of Christ's side

I hate this

I'm a bad goy

you subsume your will to His

and they pierce His flesh

through the Son

you access the Father, God the impersonal through the Person of Jesus, the divine manifestation of God

it's not an analogy for chanting and anything like that, it means believing in Him

I mean chanting is optional

and Eucharist isn't low IQ

it's just one way

it's low IQ because you take the literalist interpretation

when he was clearly not being literal

l am very high IQ

He was being literal and the Church has been teaching that forever

the bread and wine substantially become the body and blood of Christ

@agag No dude, he was not being literal. He was teaching through allegory, like in every other instance with the parables.

it's not a parable

It's either a sacrament or ordinance in most cases

do this in rememberance of me, and it's also a sacrifice

I know. It was an allegory. The bread and wine are used as symbols for His sacrifice, and for your enlightenment and bliss attained through aligning your mind unto His.

You are taking it too literally

like "if I don't eat this bread and wine I am damned dood"

that's not the point

the physical symbol is there to explain a deeper concept

Communtion