Message from @Mord
Discord ID: 497275963177172992
is this also a classical analogy
@agag John 6:35
The possibility of aliens if infinite
*is
Not necessarily. There are lots of factors and more are added to the theory everyday.
@agag Again it is referring to devotional worship. To think of, chant, and concentrate on the Son. Through Him you will never be hungry for spiritual want.
He isn't speaking about literal hunger
It's possible.....but in a .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000something of a chance
bread is considered good, goodness is from heaven
Even more than that
Or less, really.
@Fsypro Yes I think so as well
He's not talking about literal hunger but He's not talking about devotional worship either
Christ IS the bread
Hello TRS
Hello
Christ IS the wine
Just a reminder
Why am I like this?
@/pol/tard wdym?
<:BluePill:356316934444285974>
look at the Crucifixion scene
@agag Yes, but low IQ people turned this into some weird ritual about eating bread and drinking wine. Once again missing the point. To eat the bread of life to drink the "blood of Christ" is to align one's mind to his consciousness.
water and blood are what spills out of Christ's side
I hate this
I'm a bad goy
you subsume your will to His
and they pierce His flesh
through the Son
you access the Father, God the impersonal through the Person of Jesus, the divine manifestation of God
it's not an analogy for chanting and anything like that, it means believing in Him
I mean chanting is optional
and Eucharist isn't low IQ
it's just one way
it's low IQ because you take the literalist interpretation
when he was clearly not being literal
l am very high IQ
He was being literal and the Church has been teaching that forever
the bread and wine substantially become the body and blood of Christ
@agag No dude, he was not being literal. He was teaching through allegory, like in every other instance with the parables.