Message from @hemi
Discord ID: 498404797221961738
@hemi do you accept race as a scientific reality
this is about time?
🍿
I'll yeet you to the shadow realm even on mobile
Ok lets organaize the arguemnt
im not a race realist
Why not
objective truth doesnt exist is hemi's point
so no they dont'
tho i believe in gene pools and root races
its that simple
Now, consciousness or Atman is related entirely to the theic identity of self actualization. You have to sort of explain the components of it all. Mind (brain), the hardware of sorts, consciousness (self awareness of existence physically), soul (essence), free will (software of sorts which is self written). I'm using software hardware as analogy btw not seriously. @hemi
Now the Logos or God has this "self actualized" identity, in which God can write the potential for potential for contingency itself. Within humanity we have our conscious will, which operates in a similar way, albeit within the constraint of being a sub logoi, a sort of miny theic identity which is constrained and is not like God, in that it is not omnipotent. However it operates in a similar war. Within the constraints of physical law, we exercise will in an *acausal* manner, effectively writing an imprint of sorts onto the physical.
@hemi are you white
Is it objectively true that there isn't objective truth
thats a weak answe
How is it weak
from hemi
I'm just memeing but now I'm curious
@Thule-Gesellschaft [☩] very interesting
@hemi So basically consciousness is explained by this process, our free will is the component of sub logoi identity and consciousness is the energies of the Logos.
You cannot say there isn't such a thing as objective truth since you are asserting that is an oobjective truth
This is why determinism wont explain consciousness, and empirical methods wont ultimately get at it.
@☦ Slouch ☦ idk what you ar eon, but im certain you belive trump is a timewizard from the third reich
its a division i dont often distinguish
Because will itself cannot have a deterministic root, necessarily. If it did, then you'd be subject to infinite regression
and then causation itself would make no sense
because why would there be a set of events occurring infinitely in a chain if there was no beginning?
If Trump was a time wizard from the third Reich that would be cool as fuck
I should write a novel about that
there is no conceptual epistemology that can even *exist* if there's an infinite regression
I'm stealing ths t
since knowledge depends on limitation
quantity
lemme rack up the list here
don't you love
- Doenst beleive in :
you have compelling ideas man
how some leftists claim that race isn't real and yet sticks to the "wypipo evil" narrative
lil late for me hhaaa