Uhh... no. That last statement is just wrong lol

Do you know how stellar parallax works?

You observe angular size, angular elevation, angular azimuth and put this into a MODEL

Yes but like how it works?

That isn't a measurement

works? lol...there is None ❌ 😆

I just want to acknowledge that because this server isn’t a Stalinist Gulag, Time and Sheeple can actually argue *endlessly*.

Very nice.

Lol

i miss rigg

pewdiepie has a great face

I know, Peach

<:sob:507995466659659776>

Rigg will come back for you

Don’t you worry

It DOESN'T @Timebomb That's why they keep having to add elliptical orbits, abbetration of light, stellar wobble, galactic spin, intergalactic andromedean attraction, dark matter, black holes, big bang, superclusters OLDER than the big bang.....

For anyone that’s curious themselves,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_parallax

i love listening to sheeple

Yes the model is a total mess, something like 87% of the mass is MISSING, which tells me the model is 87% WRONG

@Human Sheeple lols

riggs pfp scares me as it looks like E.T

up there (the other one)

Are you talking about dark matter or dark energy?

Peach are you tripping? That looks nothing like ET

Because we don’t know really anything about either of those yet

Looks more like Wall-E, hell.

when you dont click on it it looks like E.T

like the weird face and eyes

Well get this, Einstein, a Jewish Patent Clerk WHO FAILED MATHS and helped make the Kaiser chemical weapons at University.....
claims that energy and mass are one and the same

@Ætos i think looks like Wall-E too

It looks like a weird trophy when I don’t click on it.

rigg pfp

i meant

Right, right

rigg needs a wifey fast

Last I recall, ET wasn’t gold.

smh lols
@♡♡cute but psycho♡♡

Uhm... ok. What does that have to do with stars being in different places every six months?

🤔

I like the parallel conversations going on here, lmao

@Timebomb They aren't, the amount of deviation is so small it can be explained with refraction