yes but if you fill the combustion chamber with fuel and oxidizer and you burn it, there's still enough pressure per second for a reaction to occur

however the reaction has no medium to push off

once its already combusted then its lost its explosive force

The fuel and the oxidizer are separated until they need to be mixed

or in the case of solid rocket motors the fuel and oxidizer are pre-mixed

That is why Sheeple is pointing out to you why Mr. Flappy isn’t going the other way. It should be if the Rocket were creating force to push off of.

it doesn't matter how you slice it, the rocket doesn't work in a vacuum

and pushing that it does is the same thing as pushing the globe lie

it doesn't work and you believing it works doesn't make it so

Communism is superior

in a way im kinda glad you guys dont have jobs in engineering

You can't ignore everything I just said and then say it doesn't work. You haven't given a reason for it to other than, "its in a vacuum"

i would hate to see a flat earther bridge

you mounted something on some steel girders I see no evidence the rocket is going up, all I do see is a load of gas filling up the chamber rapidly and causing a piece of material to flap clearly showing the presence of pressure in the chamber, NOT a vacuum, NOT evidence of meaningful thrust

there is a masters of physics who tells you rockets don't work in a vacuum

nothing is ever a true vacuum

maybe you should be arguing with someone who has a physics degree and knows a thing or two about physics

@tripolarbear Guess what all engineers model a flat non rotating Earth

I'm currently getting a degree in Physics and Chemical Engineering

no one said anything was a perfect vacuum

they dont

frequently

and in larger bridge designs they need to account for the curve

@Derek Nelson can you name me an engineer who DOESN'T model a flat non rotating Earth?

@tripolarbear May I see the architectural blue prints that accounted for curvature please?

Are you deliberately ignoring the whole part about "may be assumed" ?

Do you know what a manifold is?

@Human Sheeple Nope.

how about you find it you guys seem to be the ones invested in it

It's a geometric object that locally resembles Euclidean space

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOxhub1Aw20

and if you cant find it or cant be bothered you accept that i cant be bothered either

@tripolarbear So you don't have any proof then

For example, a circle is a manifold that locally resembles a line.

And a sphere is a manifold that locally resembles a 2D plane

i just cant be bothered