Message from @❖ Swiftstrike (DoQ) ❖
Discord ID: 563733125428150274
Honestly
@❖ Swiftstrike (DoQ) ❖ So if it is an oxygen tank, why is it not integrated into a space suit?
Sry I typed wrong
It’s nothing
If it's nothing, why do I see it then?
I mean we don’t know what it is
You **Think** it’s an oxygen tank
Why for approximately two seconds was this CGI unrendered 3D model of the ISS broadcast before the feed was cut?
Also how is a reflection in the window proof of flat earth
It’s not cgi
@LEGO Joker Do you accept this is a 3D unrendered CGI model of the International Space Station?
@LEGO Joker Alright what am I looking at then please?
Sure
CAD model
How do i know that’s from the feed
@❖ Swiftstrike (DoQ) ❖ Why was the cad model briefly broadcast for about 2 seconds shortly after broadcasting this "UFO" which I think resembles a scuba tank?
Because they were testing the broadcast systems and didn’t want a false start for the people in the space station
Why do you think they even have a CAD model of the ISS?
For fixing it
And for building it
Is it possible the CAD model could be UV mapped and have lighting and shadows applied to it?
They need to be able to measure it proportionately to the real thing
And yes it is
Yes
It’s to scale
Lmao that’s an actual feature on even free cad softwares like blender
Why don't they apply UV mapping, textures and lighting to the CAD model?
Cause why would they
They only need to test the station
Because it may mess up the small details
Make vital errors less visible
I thought you believed the earth was flat you seem like you just really don’t like nasa
^^^^^
How easy do you think it would be to render the 3D CAD model they already have to make it appear real?
There are these things called GPUs
They can render a lot
In like 10 minutes
Do you think NASA owns at least one GPU?