Science is repeatable and demonstrable?

But that's only to the perceptions of some people.

Not for you apperently

Have you been a scientist in the past?

Do you know all studies must be reviewed by a committee

of course not, Like i said engineering bachlors in progress

Before approval or publication

"committee"

peer review is a better word

Its absolutely true

I can see where your going

Shut up nerds

No, you have departments who have committees to approve before peer review

https://twitter.com/DailyBraap/status/1051186595473346560

Once you get into grad level studies, you see the meme

Committees are peer review you tard

It is political

Peer review is post study

some of it is

Committee approval is before

A committeee is your peers

and they are reviewing your work

peer

review

Do you not see how this is not only subjective but open to error and bias?

Of course it is subject to all of that

Or are you arguing the ideal of science existing

@Joe the boomer

Its still vastly more reliable then faith

Which is an abstraction of procedure and not real

LOL so now

We get to the core

Of your perspective

<:smug:402400327313391616> @Nicholas István

make sure you screenshot banning her

It is real to my prespective

please

maybe not to yours

You're just only engaging with something you view as slightly more reliable but still based on faith

You believe this process

Lol