Message from @AskAbout
Discord ID: 500745434055311360
science can't explain human origin any more than faith can
lol thats absurd
What makes science objective vs anyones perspective objective
you need faith in science because science hasn't objectively answered anything
How is empirical science distinguishable from empirical sensation and cognition
Science is repeatable and demonstrable?
But that's only to the perceptions of some people.
Not for you apperently
Have you been a scientist in the past?
Do you know all studies must be reviewed by a committee
of course not, Like i said engineering bachlors in progress
Before approval or publication
"committee"
peer review is a better word
Its absolutely true
I can see where your going
Shut up nerds
No, you have departments who have committees to approve before peer review
Once you get into grad level studies, you see the meme
It is political
Peer review is post study
some of it is
Committee approval is before
A committeee is your peers
and they are reviewing your work
peer
review
Do you not see how this is not only subjective but open to error and bias?
Of course it is subject to all of that
Or are you arguing the ideal of science existing
Its still vastly more reliable then faith
Which is an abstraction of procedure and not real
LOL so now
We get to the core
Of your perspective
<:smug:402400327313391616> @Nicholas István
make sure you screenshot banning her
It is real to my prespective