Message from @Questioner

Discord ID: 566605171119882240


2019-04-13 12:41:31 UTC  

as traps

2019-04-13 12:41:48 UTC  

there are some which which NASA of course has faked

2019-04-13 12:42:21 UTC  

but also others which other people have edited to make it look like NASA faked them

2019-04-13 12:42:41 UTC  

I can take a look for you, can't guarantee results and it will have to be to right cause I'm currently at work

2019-04-13 12:42:49 UTC  

But ping it me and I can look

2019-04-13 12:43:37 UTC  

And as seeker just stated

2019-04-13 12:43:43 UTC  

and then the agents who know will produce the image which doesn't have the artifacts / pixelation etc. in an effort to make FEers look wrong

2019-04-13 12:43:50 UTC  

I can't guarantee anything I do find is legit or not

2019-04-13 12:44:00 UTC  

like they did with that hole in the ISS picture

2019-04-13 12:44:08 UTC  

that was on that music album cover

2019-04-13 12:44:32 UTC  

the picture was actually supposed to be from some solar "satellite" and not the ISS

2019-04-13 12:44:35 UTC  

different picture

2019-04-13 12:44:39 UTC  

to cause confusion

2019-04-13 12:44:49 UTC  

and to discredit truthers / flat earthers

2019-04-13 12:45:16 UTC  

PhOtOshOp cS6 is beTteR

2019-04-13 12:45:19 UTC  

Also many Images on the NASA site itself have the data file scrubbed so while you can still analyse the original image you don't know 100% how or if it was edited

2019-04-13 12:46:03 UTC  

NASA lies

2019-04-13 12:46:09 UTC  

and the CIA lies

2019-04-13 12:46:11 UTC  

etc.

2019-04-13 12:46:26 UTC  

Most .gov domains lie

2019-04-13 12:46:39 UTC  

If not all

2019-04-13 12:46:58 UTC  

They will put out stories about ancient structures being airbrushed off of the moon photos when they were the ones who actually painted them on in the first place for the narrative.

2019-04-13 12:47:16 UTC  

Add in all the fake aliens from outer space and UFO BS

2019-04-13 12:47:50 UTC  

Keep the seekers confused so they can never out out an accurate answer

2019-04-13 12:48:06 UTC  

divide and conquer

2019-04-13 12:48:10 UTC  

Same as some of the so called flat earth youtubers

2019-04-13 12:48:16 UTC  

some?

2019-04-13 12:48:20 UTC  

Hired and staged channels by NASA and the like

2019-04-13 12:48:23 UTC  

how about most / a lot of

2019-04-13 12:48:32 UTC  

shill everywhere

2019-04-13 12:48:34 UTC  

Well yeah true, my fault of bad wording

2019-04-13 12:48:54 UTC  

endmenow

2019-04-13 12:48:55 UTC  

They use them to out out ridiculous or easily discreditable theories to make the more legit ones look bad or weak

2019-04-13 12:48:55 UTC  

and then there is the shill labeling itself which is an agenda XD

2019-04-13 12:49:30 UTC  

And there is also channels like sci man dan who obviously goes round discrediting the weaker channels

2019-04-13 12:49:40 UTC  

Don't forget Wolfie

2019-04-13 12:49:54 UTC  

He got his ass handed to him by Subiratis on the Equinox

2019-04-13 12:50:05 UTC  

study all, listen to all, important to have an open mind, get the tidbits of truth, sort out the BS as you go to put together the bigger picture

2019-04-13 12:50:33 UTC  

I would say roughly 1% of youtubes flat earth channels are legit

2019-04-13 12:50:50 UTC  

And a large majority of that one percent is channels that will never have any viewers

2019-04-13 12:51:14 UTC  

Mainly cause of YouTube algorithm controlling channels that the gov doesn't want people seeing