Message from @Death9Reaper
Discord ID: 567344722352537633
Except we start seeing curvature at 50000 feet
Yes, by *disproving* alternative explanations. If phenomenon A can be explained by observation B and observation C, how do you determine which observation adequately explains the phenomenon?
There has to be assumptions made with everything
Any conversation
Precisely.
@Hamburger Guy yeah but 70 percent of the Earth is covered with water
Here, let me give you an example
So Earth is mostly flat
You're coming up with hypothetical alternate theories that have an equal amount of evidence. For orbits, those _do not exist_
It's not mostly mountain
Water isnt flat
We do not have another explanation with even close to the amount of observations and evidence and models we have for orbital theory
That makes no sense
The earth is oblong
@Death9Reaper It's mostly flat
Water is not level heard of ocean currents
*under certain weather conditions
They are schedule though
@Death9Reaper proof?
@Death9Reaper That's CGI there are better photos
Would you like more photos
@Death9Reaper You realise that's an ADMITTED stitched together cartoon?
So are cartoons evidence then?
Great
@Human Sheeple Having different shots of an object which are then put together doesn't make it fake
It is taken from multiple pictures that arent cartoons
There are only two raw photos of globe earth
FLAT DEAD REDEMPTION EDGE OF THE EARTH: https://imgur.com/THm8tuQ
I FOUND THE EDGE GUYS
CARTOONS ARE VALID EVIDENCE NOW
Composite images does not mean the image is fake
I can make a composite image of my back yard, my back yard still exists.
@Bannebie Doesn't matter there are two raw photos
God, it isnt a cartoon. It is real photos just put together. Which doesnt make it any less true
I FOUND THE FIRMAMENT