Exactly

Adoption costs money and takes time

Plus the child could also be bad for society

Or more likely to not matter in society as a total

life always matters dude

Anyone infertile would be willing to pay enough money

yup

And with the right parents they can be taught right from wrong

If the child doesn't get adopted the it will be put in a foster home where it's life would be bad.

again, babies are almost always adopted straight away

there are a lot of people on waiting lists for them

its the already damaged 5y olds that dont get adopted

For example my aunt adopted 5 kids from different ages and they r amazing religious and kind kids

Actually only 62 percent of babies are actually adopted

Those are babies put up for adoption that are actually adopted

thats not a bad percentage. Especially when you consider that the others are in foster care. It might not be the best place

but I would definitely choose being alive and poor than dead

38% of babies could live an awful life

could

or

no life?

Without life no one can determine what they could become

I am not saying that all mom's should get an abortion. Abortion also sort of solves overpopulation

@Kat Looking at statistics from adoption websites, about 60% of children are put into adoption within a month of birth, however, on average, most children are adopted after 2-5 years, about 11% more than 5 years.

the attitude with abortion atm is kind of gross though

regardless on your stance i don't think it's something to act proud of

Currently, only about 2% of the American population has ever adopted

That isn't high

Well, darn thats not high

but even not being adopted doesnt cut it as a good reason to abort for me

You could have a miserable life

And suffer

And adoption rates have gone down by 50% since 2007 due to restrictions

So less and less people are adopting, or having children in general

again. Its always could.

Surely the chance is good right? I mean if ALL aborted babies were guaranteed to have a horrible life (depending on the scale) then maybe it could be a reason to approve

So the question is do you want to make a potential child suffer in an orphanage because it was forced to be birthed from a person who was not ready to be a parent, or do you want to terminate it while it has no capacity of making memories and has no sapience or sentience whatsoever

I mean I would rather word it like this: Would you make a child POTENTIALLY suffer in an orphanage

not a potential child suffer

Ah, right, I think that's what I wanted to say

but I mean....yea