Message from @Kat

Discord ID: 567376547195912194


2019-04-15 15:46:33 UTC  

38% of babies could live an awful life

2019-04-15 15:46:38 UTC  

could

2019-04-15 15:46:39 UTC  

or

2019-04-15 15:46:40 UTC  

no life?

2019-04-15 15:47:05 UTC  

Without life no one can determine what they could become

2019-04-15 15:47:16 UTC  

I am not saying that all mom's should get an abortion. Abortion also sort of solves overpopulation

2019-04-15 15:47:31 UTC  

@Kat Looking at statistics from adoption websites, about 60% of children are put into adoption within a month of birth, however, on average, most children are adopted after 2-5 years, about 11% more than 5 years.

2019-04-15 15:47:34 UTC  

the attitude with abortion atm is kind of gross though

2019-04-15 15:47:55 UTC  

regardless on your stance i don't think it's something to act proud of

2019-04-15 15:48:01 UTC  

Currently, only about 2% of the American population has ever adopted

2019-04-15 15:48:20 UTC  

That isn't high

2019-04-15 15:48:39 UTC  

Well, darn thats not high

2019-04-15 15:48:56 UTC  

but even not being adopted doesnt cut it as a good reason to abort for me

2019-04-15 15:49:14 UTC  

You could have a miserable life

2019-04-15 15:49:18 UTC  

And suffer

2019-04-15 15:49:19 UTC  

And adoption rates have gone down by 50% since 2007 due to restrictions

2019-04-15 15:49:50 UTC  

So less and less people are adopting, or having children in general

2019-04-15 15:49:50 UTC  

again. Its always could.

2019-04-15 15:50:36 UTC  

Surely the chance is good right? I mean if ALL aborted babies were guaranteed to have a horrible life (depending on the scale) then maybe it could be a reason to approve

2019-04-15 15:51:13 UTC  

So the question is do you want to make a potential child suffer in an orphanage because it was forced to be birthed from a person who was not ready to be a parent, or do you want to terminate it while it has no capacity of making memories and has no sapience or sentience whatsoever

2019-04-15 15:51:50 UTC  

I mean I would rather word it like this: Would you make a child POTENTIALLY suffer in an orphanage

2019-04-15 15:51:57 UTC  

not a potential child suffer

2019-04-15 15:52:10 UTC  

Ah, right, I think that's what I wanted to say

2019-04-15 15:52:16 UTC  

but I mean....yea

2019-04-15 15:52:17 UTC  

for me

2019-04-15 15:52:24 UTC  

its worth taking the risk for life

2019-04-15 15:52:25 UTC  

always is

2019-04-15 15:52:40 UTC  

Okay, so how many times have you adopted?

2019-04-15 15:52:40 UTC  

but thats why its such a hot potato right?

2019-04-15 15:52:59 UTC  

does my record of adoption have anything to do with this?

2019-04-15 15:53:26 UTC  

Well, you seem to want to protect a baby's life, so I imagine you would contribute to a child not suffering, no?

2019-04-15 15:53:47 UTC  

Thats a stretch tbf

2019-04-15 15:54:24 UTC  

Because saying that a mother must give birth to a child and then not giving a damn about what happens to the child *after* it was born would be very hypocritical

2019-04-15 15:54:34 UTC  

it might be

2019-04-15 15:54:41 UTC  

if anyone actually said that............

2019-04-15 15:54:53 UTC  

A could is still a probability

2019-04-15 15:55:20 UTC  

so

2019-04-15 15:55:31 UTC  

since were bringing the speakers into play here

2019-04-15 15:55:49 UTC  

have you all had shining childhoods?

2019-04-15 15:55:58 UTC  

im assuming so

2019-04-15 15:56:43 UTC  

since were noy allowed to talk about anything we arent ready to experience apparently and if a bad childhood is reason enough to not exist then you must have both had wonderful childhoods