Message from @🅱arD
Discord ID: 299633464003526657
>when USA invading Syria instead of invading China
just WHY
@Heliodromus Shingen Entirely possible at this point.
>possible
Nigger, it is
quick rundown:
>chemical weapons dropped on syria
>no evidence as to who is responsible
>everyone blames assad
>anti-assad jurnalist tweeted a day before that they were going to start reporting on the story
>trump says "this changes things"
>Kremlin says their support of Assad is not unconditional
>Secretary of State blames assad and says that they are going after assad?
@Heliodromus Shingen There's only so much consistent inconsistency before we can conclude sadism as the primary motives
hmm
seems kinda suspicious to me
State Department had fucking social media tweets about this back in 2015/2014
They removed all of the chemical weapons from Syrian military forces back then. It was the "freedom fighters"
Probably
Probably?
>Tfw when globalists want to set up a pro FSA government in syria but end up at war with russia
It probably wasn't assad.
Said freedom fighters already used chemical weapons last year
Not enough proof yet.
I remember the reports that only Russia Today published
yeah, so even if it WAS assad, we would be removing him to help people just as bad.
But the whole thing is super suspicious.
What fucking idiot
Assad has been the only ruler left in the Middle East actually fighting terror groups
who is winning politically
drops chemical weapons
on children
@Heliodromus Shingen What about iraq and iran?
95% chance it was the rebels.
Iraq has been done since Hussein was taken out, and Iran still funds various terror groups
Or Assad and his people are super incompetent
can anyone suggest a page that will give me the rundown on syria?
/sg/ on /pol/ is probably going fucking nuts
I really dont know why people are hating him, he is just finish the middle east.
Tfw you bomb a hospital and gas people but the blame goes to syria and the US invades and sets up your gov as the new one http://i.alalam.ir/news/Image/original/2013/08/25/alalam_635130223997873316_25f_4x3.jpg
@TopHatt Ultra quick rundown is that Assad's bad but the alternatives are worse for the syrians and for a terrorist free west, but Assad is freindly with russia. (((Powerful people))) want to build a pipeline to Europe through syria from the middle east, which would make russia uncompetative as an oil suplier. Assad is against this. So the (((Powerful people))) want to remove him.
*REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE*
Either "kurdistan" is going to be set up or FSA will.
How can Assad be bad when that region isn't going to spawn anything good to begin with?
so the west wants oil but a leader's in the way so they're choosing oil and big terrorism over moderate terrorism?
Just because you are the best shit doesn't mean you aren't a shit
@Heliodromus Shingen Muh barrel bombs
@TopHatt Since when do the leaders suffer the effects of the violence?