Message from @Swing and a Miss
Discord ID: 574288602360578096
Objects still fall in vacuum chambers with extremely little density?
@Swing and a Miss You might want to look into coulomb's law
Just keep spamming over my arguments lol
So Sheeple's 2nd law of acceleration then derived from Archimedes Principle
2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/i0Cww6Y
Changing the medium in the "vacuum chamber" so the density of the medium decreases so the density of hte body to the density of the medium ratio becomes greater
``` The ground itself would also be attracting the rocks a LOT more than the rocks would to other rocks,```
Yeah one problem, the groudn should be attracting DOWN, why don't you see the two giant rocks attracting one another ACROSS?
You sir are full scale ICD 10-72
How much gravity do you think two boulders have?
ZERO because you can't PROVE gravity
How much do you expect them to attract using one of the weakest forces?
@Swing and a Miss How much Pink Unicorn do you think two boulders have?
I can't prove Pink Unicorns, so am I allowed to assert them with ZERO PROOF?
Thats like saying "me blowing air in a building doesnt blow it over, therefore air doesnt exist"
You are using a w e a k f o r c e
To move a big object
@Swing and a Miss Do you understand what the word hypothetical means?
@Swing and a Miss So you acknowledge gravity is hypothetical yes?
A tree being 10 ft tall can also be hypothetical, yet exists
Youre using words too literally
Whilst we're at it, are pink unicorns hypothetical?
How about leprachauns, are they hypothetical too?
Maybe you want to add the abominable snowman to the list?
If youre just gonna keep moaning about how you think gravity is fake, you can debate someone else lol
It's not that it's fake @Swing and a Miss It's that you have failed repeatedly to prove it even admitting it's as hypothetical as pink unicorns or flying sea giraffes.
So if you're allowed to assert gravity
Then I'm allowed to assert Pink Unicorns
PINK UNICORNS 1: 0 GRAVITY
PINK UNICORNS IS THE VICTOR
You keep using things that dont exist as hypothetical while ignoring that things that do exist can also be hypothetical
>>mute @Swing and a Miss
Rekt
Also true
If they exist, you should be able to prove they exist with cause and effect scientific method experimentation
Photograph of a proton please
Photograph of a neutron please
Photograph of an electron please