Nice looking pants

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/562602642681888769/572597670326173702/GenYoutube.net_Im_a_Jew_meme_The_Strain.mp4.mp4

Hahahahahaha that's *soooo* funny

@Swing and a Miss

```as on ground level there is more air pressure than at higher altitudes. ```
Let me hold your hand ree ree.
How can you have DELTA X
Before you have X ?
How can you have GAS PRESSURE GRADIENTS?
Before you have GAS PRESSURE?
Gas Pressure is defined as the random collissions of molecules off the walls of the container.
CONTAINER = v
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volume

I don't get it

What are you trying to prove?

```Light curves upwards in your cherry picked gif```
https://imgur.com/ZGxzT55

Repeateed observations of lasers curving up in air

"In fact, it can be shown that the refraction near the horizon depends mostly on the local temperature gradient, which is much more important than the local temperature itself. For this reason, all the refraction phenomena near the horizon — mirages, dip, terrestrial refraction, etc., as well as the astronomical refraction — are very sensitive to the temperature gradient; and they all vary a great deal more than does the astronomical refraction well up in the sky."
To: "It is obvious that the effect of temperature variation is decisive over the
other atmospheric factors on refraction, to the following proportions: Temperature to humidity to carbon dioxide content to air pressure = 100 : 6 : 2 : 1 "

INVESTIGATION OF REFRACTION
IN THE LOW ATMOSPHERE
By
K. HORV_,.TH
Department of Survey. Technical university. Budapest
(Received Alay 29, 1969)
Presented by Ass. Prof. Dr. F. SAHKOZY
https://aty.sdsu.edu/explain/atmos_refr/astr_refr.html

Dope

@Swing and a Miss PEER REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF LASERS CURVING UP IN AIR

But you say light curves downwards for boats?

```Changing the density of the medium to make objects fall is just buoyancy, which is an effect of objects falling, not the cause.```
CAUSE is changing density
EFFECT is changing acceleration.

So please show me
CAUSE is changing mass
EFFECT is changing acceleration?

See you can't can you, get the fuck out of here

@Swing and a Miss
```Why do you think Cavendish has lead balls suspended in the air? ```
So they can generate static charge you gain 100volts per meter of elevation.

6. PRESENCE OF ELECTRO-STATIC FIELDS: https://imgur.com/a/pfqfVww https://imgur.com/Gzv5QgW

Objects still fall in vacuum chambers with extremely little density?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb%27s_law

@Swing and a Miss You might want to look into coulomb's law

Just keep spamming over my arguments lol

So Sheeple's 2nd law of acceleration then derived from Archimedes Principle

2. CHANGING THE DENSITY OF THE MEDIUM: https://imgur.com/i0Cww6Y

Changing the medium in the "vacuum chamber" so the density of the medium decreases so the density of hte body to the density of the medium ratio becomes greater

``` The ground itself would also be attracting the rocks a LOT more than the rocks would to other rocks,```
Yeah one problem, the groudn should be attracting DOWN, why don't you see the two giant rocks attracting one another ACROSS?

@Swing and a Miss

You sir are full scale ICD 10-72

How much gravity do you think two boulders have?

ZERO because you can't PROVE gravity

How much do you expect them to attract using one of the weakest forces?

@Swing and a Miss How much Pink Unicorn do you think two boulders have?

I can't prove Pink Unicorns, so am I allowed to assert them with ZERO PROOF?

Thats like saying "me blowing air in a building doesnt blow it over, therefore air doesnt exist"

You are using a w e a k f o r c e

To move a big object

@Swing and a Miss Do you understand what the word hypothetical means?

Sure

@Swing and a Miss So you acknowledge gravity is hypothetical yes?