yeeee

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 experiment is simple. one mass is stationary. the other is on a rod on an axis allowing it to freely rotate. a laser marks the starting position. after a certain amount of time, with now wind, the object on the axis will have rotated and moved closer to the other object, as seen by the movement of the laser, proving that mass attracts mass. now go ahead and tell me how the experiment is invalid

u have the "beliefs"
John

@hermy If you believe that, then why are you here? Go on about your life.

we have Knowingness

k

it’s 8am everyone’s asleep and I’m bored

mm'kaybee <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> ?

4 am here

@hermy ur kinda cute bro wanna meet up irl and kiss

why y’all up at 4am

u shush @Nutsack jones

@Nutsack jones You literally have no idea what a scientific method experiment is, do you?

Couldn't sleep

?????/

I’m 14 do u want the fbi lol

I got a tag

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 ok man well if you cant tell me how the experiment is invalid then....

@hermy answer the question

I asked you to detail the variables and what the **cause** for the affected dependant variable was.
Can you not do this? @Nutsack jones

a solid pass thanku tho

If not, that is why it is invalid.

@🍄The Mad Philosopher🍄 dependent variable: position of the mass. all other variables are independent

😆 😆 😆

Oh, man..

And you took into account electrostatic fields, did you?

What was the materials used for the mass?

no. please explain how that would affect the experiment. you obviously know more than my prof, so educate me

both objects were iron spheres

same material

Iron.

Hey

A **METAL!!**

mhm. im lost as to why thats relevant. please enlighten me

Did you know that bananas can’t reproduce 🍌

@Nutsack jones Do yourself a favor and look up Electrostatic fields.

ooohhh lol magnets yea bro

This argument is going nowhere

Did you know that Powered Lawnmowers Kill Almost 200 People a Year

Interesting, but disturbing facts

yeet