https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiQmQhA-OrM

you might get some point if you reinvented a squared wheel and the result is correct though

There aren't any rules though

For someone who is awfully logically inconsistent and makes use of semantically incorrect language constantly you really seem hung up on some really specific expectation of logical argument.

Examples?

Don't expect that insult to hold much weight without any examples.

lol, I didn't expect all this to escalate this much...

btw, homu since you look like you love sources, I fail to see how my students are a failure: https://www.codingame.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/slides-of-a-pitch-deck-3-410x1024.png

of course that's an opiniated source, but I provided one, can I have a cookie ? 😄

You constantly use appeal to ignorance, you also often use circular reasoning, like right now actually where you are all "you have to because that is the rules", your arguments are riddled with ad hominem you often make use of equivocation to change your arguments afterwards. Right now your argument is a false dilemma.

Also, Homu when you make claim that towelie is wrong because he does not prove his position with a source, you are shifting the burden of proof without realising that your position also is undefined to be true or false. You make an argument from ignorance.

Negative claims are also claims

it's all right chaos, there's no need to go that far for something like this

he asked for examples

I know, but I don't mind homu the way he is

I was just stating that with this mindset he would probably fail a lot in the university I work for

He would in my courses also

but I still love him

also, that might be partly my fault, my english isn't that great

I tend to fail explaining stuff sometimes since i'm not that good

holy shit

use <#274375742433787904>

just made it

nice and fresh

please delete that

lol

no one needs that

the issue wasn't about politics kirk

homu expected me to "provide sources for my claims"

it wasn't an argument about politic especially

its not just you

people keep gettin into it over politics

@Deleted User and you ? do you expect me to provides you *sources* when I say that I would bang your hairy pimpled ass ? 😄

hmm ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ?

"Also, Homu when you make claim that towelie is wrong because he does not prove his position with a source, you are shifting the burden of proof without realising that your position also is undefined to be true or false. You make an argument from ignorance."

I didn't claim that it was inherently *wrong*, I did make it clear that the lack of a source was a big issue though. As I said twice when presented the options, I chose to ignore it due to a lack of a source rather than accepting it blindly or outright claiming it was wrong.

"You constantly use appeal to ignorance, you also often use circular reasoning, like right now actually where you are all "you have to because that is the rules""

Actually, it was because he made the claim as he was presenting his argument towards me (How the things Trump's dealing with now are of low priority and are moving us backwards rather than advancing us as a society), and that I was not familiar with one of the things he brought up. Because he had made that claim in his argument towards me, the burden of proof was thus left on him as it was his responsibility in order to truly provide a meaningfull argument.

"your arguments are riddled with ad hominem you often make use of equivocation to change your arguments afterwards."

Usually as a joke or intentionally to agitate the person on the other side in order to hopefully push them into actually providing something a bit more worthwhile in the discussion (in this case, documented sources detailing the change that Trump had enstated regarding abortions, be it opinionated or not. In the case they are opinionated, multiple independent sources stating the same details, 3 at minimum with 2 being at least acceptable).

"Negative claims are also claims"

And if needed I could go ahead and provide sources as well, when asked. I didn't need sources on his other claims, just the one. I would provide that same level of respect by giving sources as well if asked.

Sorry for the late replies, I was busy watching stuff

so, you're telling me that when someone make a claim, you expect mutliple sources to back up the said claims or you simply ignore them? Can you tell me clearly why don't you search for it if this subject have any interest in your eyes?

I just typed "trump global gag rule" on google and guess what: `About 1,690,000 results (0.60 seconds) `