Message from @Towelie
Discord ID: 274375343216001025
Yes, but he made the claim, and I asked for a source
⭐ Burden of Proof ⭐
Who gives a shit what you asked for? You can find it yourself? You just seem entitled.
to be fair @Chaos , my mindset is a bit special about all this, only the result really matter in my area. In mathematic you might get some points to apply the proper function or something even if the result is false. I do care if you applied a proper algorithm for a problem, but if the result was fucked up, all you get from me is a big fat zero nonethless...
dude homu, if someone asked for a source for every claim you ever made you'd fail to give most of them.
you might get some point if you reinvented a squared wheel and the result is correct though
There aren't any rules though
For someone who is awfully logically inconsistent and makes use of semantically incorrect language constantly you really seem hung up on some really specific expectation of logical argument.
Examples?
Don't expect that insult to hold much weight without any examples.
lol, I didn't expect all this to escalate this much...
btw, homu since you look like you love sources, I fail to see how my students are a failure: https://www.codingame.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/slides-of-a-pitch-deck-3-410x1024.png
of course that's an opiniated source, but I provided one, can I have a cookie ? 😄
You constantly use appeal to ignorance, you also often use circular reasoning, like right now actually where you are all "you have to because that is the rules", your arguments are riddled with ad hominem you often make use of equivocation to change your arguments afterwards. Right now your argument is a false dilemma.
Also, Homu when you make claim that towelie is wrong because he does not prove his position with a source, you are shifting the burden of proof without realising that your position also is undefined to be true or false. You make an argument from ignorance.
Negative claims are also claims
it's all right chaos, there's no need to go that far for something like this
he asked for examples
I know, but I don't mind homu the way he is
He would in my courses also
but I still love him
also, that might be partly my fault, my english isn't that great
I tend to fail explaining stuff sometimes since i'm not that good
holy shit
use <#274375742433787904>
just made it
nice and fresh
please delete that
lol
no one needs that
the issue wasn't about politics kirk
homu expected me to "provide sources for my claims"
it wasn't an argument about politic especially
its not just you
people keep gettin into it over politics
@Deleted User and you ? do you expect me to provides you *sources* when I say that I would bang your hairy pimpled ass ? 😄
hmm ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ?
"Also, Homu when you make claim that towelie is wrong because he does not prove his position with a source, you are shifting the burden of proof without realising that your position also is undefined to be true or false. You make an argument from ignorance."
I didn't claim that it was inherently *wrong*, I did make it clear that the lack of a source was a big issue though. As I said twice when presented the options, I chose to ignore it due to a lack of a source rather than accepting it blindly or outright claiming it was wrong.
"You constantly use appeal to ignorance, you also often use circular reasoning, like right now actually where you are all "you have to because that is the rules""
Actually, it was because he made the claim as he was presenting his argument towards me (How the things Trump's dealing with now are of low priority and are moving us backwards rather than advancing us as a society), and that I was not familiar with one of the things he brought up. Because he had made that claim in his argument towards me, the burden of proof was thus left on him as it was his responsibility in order to truly provide a meaningfull argument.