Message from @Leaf me alone
Discord ID: 509222586186465280
you dont seem to realise the book nor the image says anything about numbers on a per capita basis
Based zoomers @Piccolo Niccolo
it gives direct percentages of demographics in terms of thousands
what your doing is the same way they "denunk" the fbi crime stats
have you read this?
<:hmpepe:285080453814419456> @Mazianni
1.25% of all slaveowners in the antebellum south
.yt clumsy ferret
what does that mean?
in regard to this?
i see this isnt going anywhere productive and isnt going to
please point to me where in the image, or the book, it mentions per capita
>the last OH furfag
I wish
Looks like it is saying a quarter of jews in the antebellum south had slaves
correct, be careful leaf we're talking about a picture
orkast
you fag
jews are communist subversives
referenced earlier hold on ill post it
this is what he posted
that seems inaccurate
76% of slave owners were jewish according to Rordiguez p 385
but the book says 1.21% of slave owners in the south were jewish
please provide a logical sentence
slaves are expensive
which connects per capita to those numbers
Guys can we pls
because saying per capita makes no sense right now, it's a meaningless word
because you dont want it to
good night
@a lone father k per capuno
he doesn't understand what he means by per capita