Message from @Mazianni
Discord ID: 509221837561921555
Litzinov
Feels good
<:NAZBOL:433428753591566366> <:groypernt:355744055113678848>
@a lone father k per
@a lone father k capita
<:jew:348458300947431426>
the original image does not say per capita, the book does not say per capita
it gives very direct numbers
compare it to the population consensus, its why its sourced
1.2% of all southern slave owners were jewish
Were everywhere goy <:jew:348458300947431426>
that doesn't mean anything, the mathematics aren't there, the book did the maths for us
12%?
look up what per capita is please your killing me
21% is a big number k
why do you keep saying per capita?
you are pulling per capita out of nowhere
you dont seem to understand what it is
you dont seem to realise the book nor the image says anything about numbers on a per capita basis
it gives direct percentages of demographics in terms of thousands
what your doing is the same way they "denunk" the fbi crime stats
have you read this?
<:hmpepe:285080453814419456> @Mazianni
1.25% of all slaveowners in the antebellum south
.yt clumsy ferret
what does that mean?
in regard to this?
i see this isnt going anywhere productive and isnt going to
please point to me where in the image, or the book, it mentions per capita
>the last OH furfag
I wish
Looks like it is saying a quarter of jews in the antebellum south had slaves
5000 of 20000
correct, be careful leaf we're talking about a picture