you are pulling per capita out of nowhere

you dont seem to understand what it is

you dont seem to realise the book nor the image says anything about numbers on a per capita basis

Based zoomers @Piccolo Niccolo

it gives direct percentages of demographics in terms of thousands

what your doing is the same way they "denunk" the fbi crime stats

have you read this?

<:hmpepe:285080453814419456> @Mazianni

1.25% of all slaveowners in the antebellum south

@a lone father k

.yt clumsy ferret

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_pcHCba3zo

what does that mean?

in regard to this?

i see this isnt going anywhere productive and isnt going to

please point to me where in the image, or the book, it mentions per capita

>the last OH furfag

I wish

Looks like it is saying a quarter of jews in the antebellum south had slaves

5000 of 20000

correct, be careful leaf we're talking about a picture

orkast

you fag

jews are communist subversives

referenced earlier hold on ill post it

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/508814076558835722/509209690341638145/slave.jpeg

this is what he posted

that seems inaccurate

76% of slave owners were jewish according to Rordiguez p 385

but the book says 1.21% of slave owners in the south were jewish

please provide a logical sentence

slaves are expensive

which connects per capita to those numbers

Guys can we pls

because saying per capita makes no sense right now, it's a meaningless word

because you dont want it to

good night