Message from @yogo

Discord ID: 576061843924189248


2019-05-07 21:04:04 UTC  

No dmv here

2019-05-07 21:04:20 UTC  

And we dont even know why u want to sue them

2019-05-07 21:04:37 UTC  

States think they do not have to follow consatutional law

2019-05-07 21:04:38 UTC  

GG @Suitcase, you just advanced to level 1!

2019-05-07 21:06:16 UTC  

Department of moter veitcal

2019-05-07 21:06:29 UTC  

Dmv

2019-05-07 21:07:55 UTC  

New to disscord and looking for people who can help with really bring suit, i do have standing

2019-05-09 13:36:15 UTC  

Under libertarian capitalisem
It's almost impossible for politicians to get rich
Politicians simply would have nearly enough power for companies to want to bribe them
And the taxes would be way too low

2019-05-09 15:00:53 UTC  

Under Libertarian Capitalism

2019-05-09 15:01:00 UTC  

A natural hierarchy of the richest exist

2019-05-09 15:01:04 UTC  

And the richest would be king

2019-05-09 15:01:13 UTC  

The Libertarian Capitalism is essentially Feudalism

2019-05-09 15:02:36 UTC  

You guys are thinking of liberal capitalism

2019-05-09 15:02:50 UTC  

no libertarian capitalism

2019-05-09 15:02:57 UTC  

You wanted a little government, you got it

2019-05-09 15:03:24 UTC  

The monarchy is at its foremost the weakest government at its origin

2019-05-09 15:03:26 UTC  

Yeah the way it works is that the government is still a democracy

2019-05-09 15:03:34 UTC  

OH

2019-05-09 15:03:40 UTC  

a Democratic Libertarian Capitalism

2019-05-09 15:03:56 UTC  

A real libertarian capitalism would have whoever is richest setting up how he or she wants to govern the country

2019-05-09 15:04:06 UTC  

A harsh Libertarian capitalism would never work

2019-05-09 15:04:13 UTC  

And why would the wealthy ever want the poor to vote

2019-05-09 15:04:23 UTC  

The wealthy would only want the wealthy property landowners to vote

2019-05-09 15:04:30 UTC  

which then sounds like a monarchy...

2019-05-09 15:04:36 UTC  

Well, no

2019-05-09 15:04:42 UTC  

where nobles or large landowners can participate inside politics

2019-05-09 15:04:43 UTC  

HMMM

2019-05-09 15:05:05 UTC  

If you have to force democracy in a libertarian capitalism

2019-05-09 15:05:08 UTC  

then it is no longer a libertarian

2019-05-09 15:05:34 UTC  

Don't forget that democracy hasn't even been fully utilized.

2019-05-09 15:05:39 UTC  

So libertarianism is where everyone’s body and philosophy is looked past and it’s not discriminatoryin any way

2019-05-09 15:05:39 UTC  

GG @yogo, you just advanced to level 2!

2019-05-09 15:05:44 UTC  

There hasn't been a state with legitimate elections with 95%+ voter turnout

2019-05-09 15:06:01 UTC  

People just don't care to vote when the state is doing good things for them

2019-05-09 15:06:12 UTC  

Exactly, but you are trailing from the actual point

2019-05-09 15:06:32 UTC  

not at all

2019-05-09 15:06:38 UTC  

If we look at the definition of Libertarianism by google.

2019-05-09 15:06:40 UTC  

```
an extreme laissez-faire political philosophy advocating only minimal state intervention in the lives of citizens.
```

2019-05-09 15:06:55 UTC  

Pre-1800, the monarchy was never absolute and was laissez-faire.

2019-05-09 15:06:57 UTC  

Yeah

2019-05-09 15:07:03 UTC  

No