Message from @Soup Can Sam

Discord ID: 622258586319585314


2019-09-14 02:31:11 UTC  

Ah yes lets give YouTube control of the flow of information

2019-09-14 02:31:13 UTC  

Good call

2019-09-14 02:31:19 UTC  

Not in and of itself, but emissions from the entirety of human affairs does have some effect on it

2019-09-14 02:31:35 UTC  

and?

2019-09-14 02:31:36 UTC  

8 months of driving melts about 3m^2 of arctic ice from memory

2019-09-14 02:31:51 UTC  

al gore said we were going to be dead by 2016 and it's 2019 lol

2019-09-14 02:31:51 UTC  

GG @Pathaw, you just advanced to level 2!

2019-09-14 02:31:57 UTC  

al gore is a very reputable source

2019-09-14 02:31:57 UTC  

Depends on the climate model you use, most of them show human impact at around the industrial revolution

2019-09-14 02:32:10 UTC  

what exactly is meant by "8 months of driving" though. That seems rather vague

2019-09-14 02:32:16 UTC  

At least extrapolation of the data we have now that is

2019-09-14 02:32:37 UTC  

@Cobra Commander i think it was defined as 1 hr a day for 5 days a week or something

2019-09-14 02:32:39 UTC  

I need a hard source for that driving thing to believe that

2019-09-14 02:32:41 UTC  

those 'climate scientists' are being financed by israel (us government which israel owns 95% of) and the rothschilds and others

2019-09-14 02:32:51 UTC  

yeah same, a source would be good

2019-09-14 02:32:57 UTC  

idk i read it ages ago

2019-09-14 02:32:59 UTC  

aight buddy

2019-09-14 02:33:00 UTC  

And I don't mean an article, I mean something that has been peer reviewed

2019-09-14 02:33:04 UTC  

airplanes are much worse than driving

2019-09-14 02:33:15 UTC  

obviously that data came from a peer reviewed study haha

2019-09-14 02:33:27 UTC  

Oh man

2019-09-14 02:33:46 UTC  

Not necessarily though.

2019-09-14 02:33:57 UTC  

journalists dont come up with their own data, but they do manipulate other people's studies to show things they want to show

2019-09-14 02:34:17 UTC  

nah bogus climate claims are perpetuated based on something journalists read on twitter

2019-09-14 02:34:23 UTC  

Just look at the amazon fire fiasco

2019-09-14 02:34:27 UTC  

ehhh actually no, they can pretty much come up with stuff

2019-09-14 02:34:38 UTC  

they CAN but they generally dont

2019-09-14 02:34:41 UTC  

not saying that was necessarily the case here, but just something to consider

2019-09-14 02:35:11 UTC  

Honestly they generally do, most journalistic organizations don't even issue retractions when they're straight up wrong

2019-09-14 02:35:16 UTC  

the fires were the same under lula and roussef but no one said shit

2019-09-14 02:35:36 UTC  

I mean I could come up with 3 or 4 examples off the top of my head

2019-09-14 02:35:58 UTC  

That is true, especially in recent years a number of journals has been extremely shotty

2019-09-14 02:36:01 UTC  

man if you really think journalists "generally make stats up on the spot" i feel like you're in fairytale conspiracy land...

2019-09-14 02:36:12 UTC  

and i have nothing wrong with conspiracies

2019-09-14 02:36:16 UTC  

News papers ignoring the firing of rubber bullets into the eyes and throats of yellow vesters being an international example

2019-09-14 02:36:22 UTC  

just a subset of them are very much fairytales

2019-09-14 02:36:37 UTC  

yea but thats omission dude

2019-09-14 02:36:42 UTC  

its not "making stats up"

2019-09-14 02:36:52 UTC  

lie by omission

2019-09-14 02:36:58 UTC  

Covington and Amazonian Forest Fires being another 2

2019-09-14 02:37:00 UTC  

Hmm