Fukoshima you mean 2 nuclear blast

3

But nuclear blasts are actually quite unlikely

But alot of it was the cause of tsunami and earthquakes

ya put that in california and when a tsunami comes..stay tuned.

Anything in California has the risk of being hit by anything

That's why you wouldn't do it in California

Especially when you have the rest of America to put it in

Yes far from tsunamis

then america would be a chernyobal disaster

not taking no chance on nuclear energy

ok

So your telling me that in the span of 80 years only 3 nuclear disasters were made

if we have nuclear energy

Meanwhile with coal and oil!

in the whole country

solar!

oil can work

Oil has way more accidents than Nuclear will ever have in 100 years

3 in the span of 80 year and
Nuclear power plants are so secure that it took both
An earthquake and a tsunami to cause it

Boiiii

or tornado

hurricane

Boooiiiiii 80 year and 1 was intentional

wind

obama

yes obama caused fukashima

So we only have 2 unintentional disasters happening and 1 needed the combined power of a tsunami and earthquake

For it to happen if that doesnt prove the safety of nuckear power plant i dont know what will

and obama

Obama, who has been out of power for 3 years?

nah he lurking

somewhere

I used to be sceptic about nuclear power

GG @dandelion, you just advanced to level 3!

what changed it

obama?

@Deleted User but you convinced me it was safe

who

me?

You