Message from @dandelion
Discord ID: 567662473306570772
omg
idiot
such an idiot
Well, your points against nuclear only works if the power station is built near the edge of a plate
E.g: Japan
I also said that they can blow up or cause a meltdown with tornados, hurricanes, winds etc
And also it takes the combined power of tsunami and eartquakes to cause a nuclear disaster
I mean that seems really safe
@Deleted User Those are most common near the edge of the plates
Chad Nuclear power > beta Solar and Geothermal > Virgin Wind and coal > cucked Oil and Gas
And also you prove that it was unlikely
3 nuclear disaster in 80 years
And 1 isnt even a disaster
3 imagine in america
20
50
A place that doesnt have frequesnt earthquakes
3 across the world in 80 years
Looks like good odds
imagine america
Again, America is not the entire world
am I talking about the entire world
no
im talking about america
Yes but those are exceptionally good odds
omg
Coal mining
You know how many mines collaped
Bra I’m Australian
I know that coal mining feel
Go up to the North of England and, despite the fact that they've been closed for 30 years, there are still effects from the mines on the local populace
Especially the former workers
believe in your nuclear bullshit, but be aware im not accepting you in my house when theres a meltdown and nuclear energy in the air
I will be wearing a gas mask
@Deleted User yes but coal mining
= landslides, collapsing mines , farming
You’ll have to be wearing a gas mask anyway from that Koch owned coal fire power planet down the block in Republican town
Id take 3 nuclear disasters in 80 years than 1000's in 80 years
@Deleted User The sourcr that you cited still claims that Nuclear is better
Overall
omg
you didnt look at the cons