me?

You

what was safe

Nuclear power you tried arguing that the dangers of nuclear power and
By listening to your point you prove they were safe

omg

idiot

such an idiot

Well, your points against nuclear only works if the power station is built near the edge of a plate

E.g: Japan

I also said that they can blow up or cause a meltdown with tornados, hurricanes, winds etc

And also it takes the combined power of tsunami and eartquakes to cause a nuclear disaster

I mean that seems really safe

@Deleted User Those are most common near the edge of the plates

https://www.renewableresourcescoalition.org/nuclear-energy-pros-cons/

Chad Nuclear power > beta Solar and Geothermal > Virgin Wind and coal > cucked Oil and Gas

And also you prove that it was unlikely
3 nuclear disaster in 80 years

And 1 isnt even a disaster

3 imagine in america

20

50

A place that doesnt have frequesnt earthquakes

3 across the world in 80 years

Looks like good odds

imagine america

Good odds man

Again, America is not the entire world

am I talking about the entire world

no

im talking about america

Yes but those are exceptionally good odds

omg

Coal mining
You know how many mines collaped

Bra I’m Australian

I know that coal mining feel

Go up to the North of England and, despite the fact that they've been closed for 30 years, there are still effects from the mines on the local populace

Especially the former workers

believe in your nuclear bullshit, but be aware im not accepting you in my house when theres a meltdown and nuclear energy in the air

I will be wearing a gas mask

@Deleted User yes but coal mining
= landslides, collapsing mines , farming

You’ll have to be wearing a gas mask anyway from that Koch owned coal fire power planet down the block in Republican town

Id take 3 nuclear disasters in 80 years than 1000's in 80 years