only about 1/5 of the things I say are serious

@qwasi like your brain cells

1/5 of my brain cells are serious?

Only about 1/5th of your family loves you

Coincidence?

so 4/5 of my brain cells are jokesters?

Yes

ok

Not like new joker

Dumb

Like Jared Leto joker

I don't watch superhero movies because I'm not 11 years old

so I have no idea who that is

hahaha

Not 11 years old... yet

based qwasi

You'll get there

LOL

yes, I'm 10 and not allowed to watch violent movies yet

<:epic:583660735402475563>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewJ6TI8ccAw

Fuck climate change

To sum it up

1/3 to a half of meteorologists don't believe climate change is man-made

https://www.ecowatch.com/glacier-national-park-signs-replaced-2644665325.html

"Glacier National Park Is Replacing Signs That Predicted Glaciers Would Disappear by 2020"

"She said that the new signs will say: "When they will completely disappear depends on how and when we act. One thing is consistent: the glaciers in the park are shrinking."

**Grinnell Glacier and the Jackson Glacier appear to have been growing—not shrinking—since about 2010. (The Jackson Glacier—easily seen from the Going-To-The-Sun Highway—may have grown as much as 25% or more over the past decade.)**

That's right, the glaciers are growing

<:200iq:583246977634926592> 🧠

ugh i can't post images here?

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/arctic-sea-ice/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/

Why can't a mod post images here?

what proof did they have again for manmade climate change?

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145185/major-greenland-glacier-is-growing

Honestly, I thought this was trolling

What people don't realize, or don't want to realize, because it suits their agendas to say that if a glacier is growing, that means that global warming is slowing and/or that global warming is fictitious, is that this is a temporal growth, boosted by a temporal influx of cold waters due to a major shift in NAO, which, coincidentally, is also a sign of a dangerous climate change. When temps around the glaciers drop, they thicken, then when the temperatures rise, they naturally thin out. Which is the case for Jakobshavn for example, and it has been since forever, given how naturally occurring ocean cycles (think the likes of El Niño) contributed to the ocean's several degrees drop in temp. So, then the process enters its reverse phase, but each time this happens, due to the very real global warming, the discrepancies between low and high sea levels will become larger and larger after each cycle.

So, saying that "oh, Jakobshavn is growing, we fine" is fucking moronic.

so there was aannn iceberg after aall...damit

What?