Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 551761559412670465
US does operate *?30?* ABM-s (anti-ballistic missile) but their success rate is 50% and that is in scenarios where the crew knew that an excercise would be happening and for each ICBM, 2 interceptors are deployed. 30 divided by 2 is 15. In a perfect scenario US could defend itself from 15 ICBM-s. And take into the consideration that they are located in Alaska and California. Russian ICBM-s would be coming from the north. And Russians have wayy more ICBM-s than US has interceptors.
ABM-s being GMD-s in this case
or Ground-Based Midcourse Defense
they consist of GBI-s
ground-based interceptors
But if ww3 happened nukes wouldn't be involved
<:doubt:511986509679820843>
👌
although C3 stage of GMD-s consists of more locations and about 200 operational GBI-s
but that would require more 💰
Yea
But thats why we have NATO
no.
thats the only protection from ICBM-s US has. But US does operate defense systems against other ballistic missiles tho
short range
mid range
Oh
most notably THAAD and Aegis
Damn i mean if usa engaged 1st then russia has no choice
chu mean?
GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 3!
like
what you mean by that?
```
Damn i mean if usa engaged 1st then russia has no choice```
If usa attacks Pakistan russia well engage an attack on us soil
depends on what you mean by an attack
Nukes
I seriously doubt that
and US wont attack Pakistan
I mean
I guess
and for a very simple reason
you see this?
Oh
there is only 1 viable way to access Afghanistan
and US only uses 1 way right now to transport its supplies to Afghanistan
... its Pakistan
without Pakistan, there wouldnt be a war in Afghanistan
Im still flabbergasted how did the pakis start war in Afghanistan