Message from @Techpriest
Discord ID: 569993241659965451
had to be disposed off by socialists
If you seen Persia under his rule, women need not apply clothes to all of their body
women were free to express themselves
yes because america is set up like an EA game, pay to win, but in the 100 million dollar variety
women were allowed to drive
but instead the socialists were too greedy
and forced the shah out of his benevolent rule
"muh muh democracy"
and democracy got the iranian clergy elected instead of the socialists
what a surprise
socialism is the worst political system, besides all the others
The monarchy is the best political system
undisputable redpills
🤔
His private and public interest overlaps
He cannot be rich if his kingdom is not rich
He rules with the sovereignty that he represents all interest of his people.
In a democracy, the politicians are only representing SOME interest of the people.
Democracy Politicians are elected by Charisma and Money.
whereas a monarchy is elected and appointed under the social contract of the governed and govern
It is also true that the King has no opponents against him and that's a good thing.
Look where America got them in the issue of slavery
It took them 4 years to fight a war losing 5% of their population
to ban slavery
That doesn't sound very good
Whereas the King only wrote a law
outlawing slavery
and slavery was outlawed without losing a single drop of blood
Wouldn't that give the Government more power than it already has?\
If he serves the interest of you better than the politicians of democracy
would that be a bad thing?
Let's consider Trump
If Trump only represent the interest of the Republican Party, is he really representing the interest of everybody?
monarchy is okay but you have to have a good monarch
GG @CallMeTruckson, you just advanced to level 4!
A king however needs to represent the interest of everybody in terms of the general will.
Even the ancient greek thinkers considered monarchy to be the best form of government
A king?
Even early-moderns like Hobbes
argued the monarch to be a best form of government