Message from @The Lemon
Discord ID: 588785035834818578
Probably not
It be better anyways to pass it as a bill since spending is so hard to cut anyways
It’s whatever that other guy said
Tbf I really don't know about how passing new laws in the American system works
I’m just chiming in
House creates spending bills and it moves to be passed from there
Funding the programs of the executive (president)
Like social security etc
Ah k
"should work as a replacement to current welfare policies"
what the fuck
So you will actually LOSE money if you're claiming that
Andrew Yang specifically said that you can either choose the $1000/month
or choose the welfare policies you can keep
Since when do U.S. Laws require a constitutional amendment to be passed/modified, UBI can easily fall into muh "interstate commerce" clause
It's clear Yang wants to pass it as a new Amendment
Making it impossible to dismantle the UBI without a constitutional amendment
@Techpriest you won't lose money because its an opt in
I don't see why that makes it a bad policy though
Ridiculous
You do lose money
A VAT tax of 10% won't pay for the $1k/month for everybody
It's a stealth welfare reform
Why not instead of giving 1k a month to dumb ghetto thugs they just give every American a stock in the big 4 and a US bond. Then we can all get a house and mind our own buisness
Wat
What do you think the USD is
If not a bond
trump is so hot
i would smash
Ahahahahahaha
"Just give every american a stock in the big 4 and a US bond"
Like thats gonna help shit
The stock market is barely more than gambling on the success of different companies, you can't change my mind
@Techpriest he's not saying USD I'm pretty sure he's saying a US government loan
Also Yang has never said its anything but a welfare reform
He's always been clear that UBI is a replacement to current systems of welfare
Ofc