that doesn't say anything though. If there is something that he is promising that is *unlawful* then you have a case.

Dude this is breaking news from the Washington Post, I’m not going to “not refer to it”

Jesus Christ

Lmao specialist say that to Benjamin Netanyahu

The Clinton machine finally crumbled

It was something troubling enough that a high level intelligence official felt the need to disclose it to the house oversight committee

Honestly

<:PeepoChrist:583237123126329344>

So

hey guys this just in, hillary said shes innocent and her hand picked buddies said so too, that mean shes innocent

Anyway, your statement about obstruction is not accurate

Trump:good

If you obstruct justice, there needn’t be an underlying crime

Lol

At the end of end of the day the people need to unite we are all being kept in the dark

Because otherwise, obstruction of justice isn’t a crime, as long as you do it successfully

And how do we know it isn't part of a move against trump from within the governemnt? Again, once there is proof of something unlawful there, then you have a case.

Lol

Actually you *do* need an underlying crime.

rudy gouliani said crime isnt a crime

People WAke up lmao

@Cobra Commander that sort of conspiracy theory talk is exactly why you are a trump loyalist

There is a soft coup going on rn xD

@Cobra Commander no, you absolutely do not need an underlying crime. Where did you hear that?

Duhhh

You're accusing *me* of conspiracy talk?

Yikes

Yes, you are talking about a qanon deep state conspiracy

@Cobra Commander and giving his own son clearand=ce is illegal, and he obstructed tht and obstructed the investigation into that

By the intelligence community

That's the reactionary way out, calling it a conspiracy theory lol

I never made a *claim*

Do you sincerely think that you can’t obstruct justice without an underlying crime?

Bruh the intelligence community is not always correct.

Like are you that stupid? Or is this just a game

Besides there's alot of missing parts of the puzzle

the emoluments clause is open to interpretation... fuck man tis not the bible its a law

I simply made a point about there being very little to support the nefarious nature of that besides it troubling some people

People like to play decryption when it comes to trump

@Cobra Commander troubling top intelligence officials enough to trigger a whistleblower clause?

im done with this guy, i got a headache