Message from @Pelth

Discord ID: 629332400756883500


2019-10-03 14:58:58 UTC  

Congress is supposed to and the power of the purse

2019-10-03 14:59:02 UTC  

No it’s not

2019-10-03 14:59:09 UTC  

...yes it is

2019-10-03 14:59:21 UTC  

It says says that in the constitution

2019-10-03 14:59:32 UTC  

Wholesale budget reallocations are much more common than you think

2019-10-03 14:59:33 UTC  

Pelth sincerely- have you read the constitution?

2019-10-03 14:59:42 UTC  

the federal government of the United States, the power of the purse is vested in the Congress as laid down in the Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 (the Appropriations Clause) and Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (the Taxing and Spending Clause).

2019-10-03 14:59:47 UTC  

For instance?

2019-10-03 14:59:51 UTC  

It was only made controversial because the liberals don’t want him to build a wall

2019-10-03 15:00:04 UTC  

So when else has something like this happened?

2019-10-03 15:00:05 UTC  

You're diverting topic

2019-10-03 15:00:11 UTC  

He’s also lying

2019-10-03 15:00:18 UTC  

Let's get back to the Constitution

2019-10-03 15:00:36 UTC  

Congress controls the purse, not the particulars in how each dollar is spent

2019-10-03 15:00:44 UTC  

False.

2019-10-03 15:01:02 UTC  

Congress allocates the money and says how it should be spent

2019-10-03 15:01:14 UTC  

The power of the purse plays a critical role in the relationship of the United States Congress and the President of the United States, and has been the main historic tool by which Congress has limited executive power. One of the most prominent examples is the Foreign Assistance Act of 1974, which eliminated all military funding for the government of South Vietnam and thereby ended the Vietnam War. Other recent examples include limitations on military funding placed on Ronald Reagan by Congress, which led to the withdrawal of United States Marines from Lebanon.

2019-10-03 15:01:15 UTC  

GG @pennypal, you just advanced to level 2!

2019-10-03 15:01:35 UTC  

The money was budgeted for military construction and is being spent for military construction

2019-10-03 15:01:49 UTC  

The wall is a pet project of trump and has nothing to do with the military

2019-10-03 15:02:16 UTC  

Immigration security is national security

2019-10-03 15:02:25 UTC  

Or is there an invasion?

2019-10-03 15:02:37 UTC  

Yes, by criminal aliens

2019-10-03 15:02:42 UTC  

Lol

2019-10-03 15:03:02 UTC  

There are more people overstaying their visas illegally... And by the way that's how the 9/11 bombers got in

2019-10-03 15:03:08 UTC  

Correct

2019-10-03 15:03:23 UTC  

To date no terrorists have come in through the southern border

2019-10-03 15:03:25 UTC  

Also, the military is expressly forbade from engaging in law enforcement

2019-10-03 15:03:37 UTC  

In fairness, pelth is literally an avowed fascist

2019-10-03 15:03:37 UTC  

It was found to be appropriate for him to use the money for the wall so you’re arguing based off incorrect interpretations

2019-10-03 15:03:45 UTC  

It was not

2019-10-03 15:03:49 UTC  

Yes it was

2019-10-03 15:03:51 UTC  

Right. When Trump sent troops to the southern border they couldn't do anything

2019-10-03 15:03:56 UTC  

He was cleared by the courts

2019-10-03 15:03:56 UTC  

If you believe that is true, you do not understand the ruling

2019-10-03 15:04:15 UTC  

No, it was ruled that the president has discretion while the case is decide

2019-10-03 15:04:32 UTC  

So you admit I was right

2019-10-03 15:04:42 UTC  

This isn't about being right or wrong

2019-10-03 15:04:48 UTC  

It's about doing the best thing for our country

2019-10-03 15:04:57 UTC  

He has the discretion to reallocate the budget since he is in charge of the military

2019-10-03 15:05:05 UTC  

Checkmate liberals